They were Italian immigrants--following WWI, immigrants in particular from warring countries were seen as dangerous and often target as trying to destroy America.
Sacco and Vanzetti were Italian immigrants and anarchists accused of a murder in their local neighborhood. Their link to an immigrant group and known union activities led to their arrest and execution. The US entered a time of "normalcy" and wished to rid the US of foreign influence to include anarchists and Communists.
<h3>38th parallel, popular name given to latitude 38° N that in East Asia roughly demarcates North Korea and South Korea. The line was chosen by U.S. military planners at the Potsdam Conference (July 1945) near the end of World War II as an army boundary, north of which the U.S.S.R. was to accept the surrender of the Japanese forces in Korea and south of which the Americans were to accept the Japanese surrender. The line was intended as a temporary division of the country, but the onset of the Cold War led to the establishment of a separate U.S.-oriented regime in South Korea under Syngman Rhee and a communist regime in North Korea under Kim Il-sung.</h3>
<h2>please mark in brain list </h2>
The choices can be found elsewhere and as follows:
<span>-It struck down the use of strict racial quotas.
-It ruled race could not be factored into admissions.
-It limited diversity and inequality in the workplace.
-It changed the way applications could be written.
I think the correct answer is the first option. </span>Regents v. Bakke change affirmative action policies by striking down the use of strict racial quotas.
The above question seeks to analyze your writing ability and your perception of the Indian Removal Act. For this reason, it is not correct for me to write this letter to you, but I will show you how to write it.
First of all, you should know that the Indian Removal Act was established to remove Native Americans from the lands where they lived and forcibly place them on government-selected Indian reservations.
Although many people believe this was a good decision to protect the natives from the settlers' ambition. Others claim that this decision was abusive, that forced the displacement of the natives from their lands, and placed them in inferior lands. The natives, in turn, do not think that this decision was correct and fair.
You must research this law and determine your opinion of it, that is, you must determine whether this law was a good or bad decision.
After that, you can write your letter as follows:
- Start with a greeting to the person who will read your letter. This greeting can be "Dear Mr/Mrs ____" if you know the reader's name, or "Whom it may concern," if you don't know the reader's name.
- Then introduce yourself and show why you are writing the letter.
- Present your opinion on the Indian Removal Act, highlighting the reasons that made you build this opinion.
- Show if you think the results of the Indian Removal Act are positive or negative.
- End the letter by summarizing your arguments.
- Say goodbye cordially.
You can get more information about the Indian Removal Act at this link:
brainly.com/question/2035986
Answer:
1. arc B is half the circle
2. not shure
