Since there isn't any options I'll give you my best answer. The balance of power shifted after Shay's rebellion. Daniel Shay was a farmer and pretty much him and a bunch of farmers were unhappy with the bank. So, they decided to rebel and assault the bank. This is at the time where the national government had little power both military and democratically compared to the states. The government tried calling the states for help but they didn't. After this event it was decided that the government should be made more powerful
The jobs in each region were different due to the economy and the geography there. That is what decided what jobs were available
The evidence used by Duara to support his claim about Western racial attitudes and Japanese militarism is that Japan had a <u>lower quota of ships</u><u> than others</u>.
<h3>What was the western racial attitude towards Japanese militarism?</h3>
The West responded to the increased Japanese militarism with:
- Tariffs, which limited exports
- Discriminatory legislation
- Anti-Japanese racism
- Barriers to emigration.
Thus, the ONE piece of evidence that Duara uses in the passage to support his claim regarding Western racial attitudes and Japanese militarism in the second paragraph is that Japan had a <u>lower quota of ships</u><u> than others</u>.
Learn more about Japanese militarism at brainly.com/question/352521
Answer: There has to be a balance between each branch
Explanation:
