Answer:
Lucky event
Explanation:
In the investments market a true measure of market efficiency is to get a track record of positive outcome from investors over time.
The lucky event problem occurs when an investor makes a profit on investment not because of how efficient a market is or by a logical procedure, but rather by chance.
In the given scenario Keyes put all his money in one stock that doubled in 3 months.
However this was not replicated among other investors who made similar vets on other stocks and lost.
This is an exams of lucky event problem in determining market efficiency.
Answer:
<u>True</u>
Explanation:
The proportionality principle encourages for <em>balance or fairness. </em>Therefore, in its policy creation, the security levels, costs, practices, and procedures of a company <u>should be appropriate and proportionate to the degree of reliance on the system and the value of the data.</u>
For instance, you would not expect the security level of a company concerning its customers contact information to be the same with the company's operating address, because the latter is less sensitive.
Answer:
Dr. Employee Benefits expense $22,700
Cr. Medical Insurance payable $13,500
Cr. Employee retirement program payable $9,200
Explanation:
The cost of fringe benefit provided to the employee of the company and any tax component attached to it is known as the employee benefit expense.
Total employee benefit expense is the sum of medical insurance and employee retirement program. As medical insurance and retirement program is payable until now so, it is recorded as a liability.
Employee benefit expense = $13,500 + $9,200 = $22,700
Answer:
Explanation:
We shall apply the concept of coefficient of variation to know the consistency of data
coefficient of variation
= standard deviation / mean or average
In case of City A
coefficient of variation = 86 / 820
= .1048
In case of City B
coefficient of variation = 75 / 790
= .0949
Since it is less for city B , rent for this city is more consistence or with less of variation
So the conclusion is false.
