Answer:
(B) lead to a "lose-lose" scenario where goals may not be achieved, and the relationship may not progress beyond its current state.
Explanation:
When you use an accommodation strategy to solve conflicts you are trying to maintain a good relationship and may end up sacrificing achieving your goals. The problem is that if the relationship conflict is not solved and the goals are not achieved, then you couldn't complete anything correctly.
An accommodation strategy basically refers to solving conflicts by placing the concerns of others or the employees, above the concerns and goals of the business. This approach can be useful when the tasks or activities that are generating the internal conflicts are not that important, while healthy long term relationships are very for achieving more significant goals.
Available Options Are:
A. Reduce the probability that PPP shall hold.
B. Increase the probability that PPP shall hold.
C. Increase the probability the IFE will hold.
D. B and C
Answer:
Option A. Reduce the probability that PPP shall hold
Explanation:
The reason is that Purchasing Power Parity Theory assumes:
- Perfect Market Conditions,
- No Trade Barriers exist.
- No Transaction Cost exists.
- No technological dominance of other countries
- Free Trade across the world
These are some factors that will definitely affect the reliability of the theory. Hence these assumptions are unrealistic and it is obvious that the model will not hold true because of these unrealistic assumptions and other factors like interest rate, government debt, recession, etc.
Hence the option A is correct here.
If Option A is correct then Option B is incorrect because is totally opposite.
Option C is incorrect because it assumes that their are no external factors that will be affecting the exchange rate which means that the exchange rate is not controlled by the government. This means it only holds for long term and not for short term. Hence the Option C is incorrect.
Answer:
yes its possible. You could sell dirt
Answer:
The answer is: True
Explanation:
An incentive is a punishment or a reward that induces someone (or the general public) to act a certain way. Many times incentives work because people compare costs and benefits. For example, in Europe gas prices are extremely high due basically to high taxes on gas. That is why most cars sold in Europe are much smaller and fuel efficient than those sold in the US were taxes on gas are usually much lower so the gas price is also much lower. The incentive is saving money even though most European cars aren´t as comfortable as those sold in the US.
In this specific question, those who wanted to drink beer will probably calculate how many beers they need to buy or drink to offset the expenses of going to the next county to buy beer. Probably no one will travel several miles just to buy 1 beer, but at some amount of beer the math will make you drive. Besides losing business in your own county, another collateral damage is the rise in drunk driving.