This question is about the article "Wild Horses as Native North American Wildlife"
Most proof proposes that the horses are indeed a local animal varieties, supporting the contention that the horses should have really been in North America for over 11,000 years.
<h3> Which statement best delineates the claim?.</h3>
Correct answer is option B.
- The horses' Spanish orgins have been verified by DNA analysis, and this common ancestry helps support the argument that there is now a serious problem of inbreeding in the horse population.
- As indicated by the article, wild horses of Spanish beginning were taken to North America with Columbus and his company.
- They kept these horses in Mexico, on Colombus' second journey to the landmass in 1493.
- The horses that were gotten around then were E. caballus, which from where Mexico is today, started to spread across the Great Planices, mixing in an area of the USA and bringing about the local species we know today.
Therefore, correct answer is option B.
For more information about North American Wildlife, refer he following link:
brainly.com/question/19151070
Answer:
Many teachers use the internet to increase learning in the classroom.
Explanation:
a counterargument is the comeback from the argument. It is what the opposing side of an argument would say one response to the first side.
In this case, the main argument is that too much time on the internet means lower test scores. What is the opposite of that argument, something the opposing side would say? Teachers use the internet as a tool to make learning better for students.
Answer:
I would really like to help but is there any way you could attach the passage.
Explanation:
I want to give the best answer I can and I could help you if I could see the passage.
Explanation:
it depends on what type of situation are you using it and or the subject you are asking for