Answer:
The option that best describes how Anaya effectively uses rhetoric in the excerpt to convince readers that his conclusion is justified is:
B) Anaya establishes his credibility as a published Chicano author by discussing his career experience.
Explanation:
Rhetoric concerns the use of devices and strategies to convince the audience of your opinion or perspective. A commonly efficient way to do so is by establishing your own credibility concerning the subject. That is what Anaya is doing in this excerpt. He gets to talk about language and culture in American literature, and be taken seriously while doing it, due to his credibility as a published Chicano author. His life and career are devoted and dependent on this subject, which gives him some sort of authority to discuss it.
The way he tells the story and how it was a different era. His language is kind of backwards let just say.
Augustine of Hippo (later canonized as “St<span>. </span>Augustine<span>”) was unquestionably a giant of Christian thought and teaching at the time he wrote in the early fifth century AD. He remains so to .... And theft, in </span>his<span> view, was “absolute wickedness” because it violated something sacred: “the </span>law<span> written in our hearts.”.</span>
False, because sometimes you already know the plot.
