1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BigorU [14]
3 years ago
6

Why does Hamilton think judges should be appointed permanently rather than on a periodic basis?

History
2 answers:
Damm [24]3 years ago
6 0
Periodic appointments would destroy a judge’s independence.
Tomtit [17]3 years ago
5 0

"They will be flexible and inconsistent in doing their job" is the right answer.  

According to Hamilton, the judiciary must be autonomous in order to achieve its main goal in a democratic government. It is vitally important in a democracy that individual magistrates and the judiciary as a body are impartial and autonomous of all outside pressures. As a result, the permanent position of the judges would be able to gain the confidence of people and society that their cases will be resolved impartially.

You might be interested in
Americans debate whether to go to war or not
Evgen [1.6K]

Explanation:

the sessions laws violated the first moment to the use which is protect freedom of speech and the pressure

6 0
3 years ago
Are you homeschooled,private ,public schooled
jeyben [28]

i am Home schooled.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Delegates met at a convention at Washington-on-the-Brazos on March 1, 1836 in order to —
Genrish500 [490]

Answer:

Form a new government

Explanation:

Being discontent with the repeated abuses of the Mexican Government and the Mexican Constitution of 1824, a group of young elected delegates met in Washington-on-the-Brazos, Texas in March 1836, with the purpose of declaring Texas independence from Mexico, forming a new government and starting working on a new Constitution that protected some rights such as the right to due process, to bear arms,  to practice the religion they wanted and their right of freedom of speech and press.

8 0
3 years ago
Corroboration is important when analyzing sources because it
Lorico [155]

Answer:

Corroboration. When you are analysing a source, it is helpful to compare what information it provides when compared with other sources. This helps you to more successfully evaluate your sources, especially in regards to their accuracy.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What differences separated the Soviet Union from the United States in the
nexus9112 [7]
The answer is C.The United States has a capitalist economy; the Soviet Union had.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Catholic Church hierarchy _____ Liberation Theology.
    11·1 answer
  • In your own words provide an objective summary of amendment v
    10·1 answer
  • The judicial branch of government is comprised of which individuals or groups? (Select all that apply.)
    8·2 answers
  • Why do you think the Spanish made their first landing on the North American mainland in Florida?​
    13·1 answer
  • Which two European countries ruled the New World?
    7·1 answer
  • Of the three types of colonies that existed in the New World, which one had the most independence from the king?
    11·1 answer
  • The Native Americans felt that broken glass was
    12·2 answers
  • Most of the paragraphs are in chronological order, except for the first paragraph. Read these sentences from the first paragraph
    10·2 answers
  • What did Anne McLaren discover?
    6·1 answer
  • 15
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!