Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

14

In 1950, half of the world's 10 largest cities were in europe and the united states. how many european and u.s. cities are proje

cted to be in the list of the world's 10 largest cities in 2025

1 answer:

Elina [12.6K]3 years ago

8 0

The biggest city<span> in the </span>world<span> with 36.7 million inhabitants</span>

You might be interested in

Which best describes how the information lobbyists provide to lawmakers is significant? A) Lobbyists are allowed to provide fals

Gelneren [198K]

<u>What the lobbyists do: </u>

<em><u>Research issues </u></em>

• Build coalitions w/ other groups

• Develop strategy

• Meet with legislators & staff

• Attend/testify at committee hearings

• Negotiate with other legislators,

administration, etc.

• Campaign to build public pressure

<u><em>Lobbyists form an</em></u> “<u>extended staff</u>” <u><em>for Congress </em></u>

• <u><em>They provide all sorts of information</em></u>:

– Technical research on bills

– Political information on bills

– They write speeches

– They provide witnesses for hearings

– They organize legislative coalitions

– They provide info for constituents on MC’s behalf

• <u><em>Lobbyists provide info to Congress</em></u>

• <u><em>Lobbyists also provide info to clients</em></u>

– What Congress or agencies are doing

• <u><em>Lobbyists may act as negotiators</em></u>

– They are diplomats trying to win the best deal

<u>The answer that comes closest is B</u>: <u><em>Lobbyists have access to information that may not be available to others, including politicians</em></u>.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which was a shared proposal in the Reconstruction plans put forward by Presidents Lincoln and Johnson?

Amanda [17]

A shared proposal by Lincoln and Johnson regarding the reconstruction plan was the exclusion of ex-Confederate officers during the Civil War.

<h3>What was the Reconstruction period?</h3>

The reconstruction period was the duration from the year 1865 to the year 1877 pertaining to reconstructing the US country after the end of the Civil war.

The reconstruction plan developed by Lincoln comprised of the oath taken to the union by the 10% of former confederate officers, the establishment of constitutions for new emerging states, and providing ex-confederate soldiers to be forgiven for the actions and misdeeds in the times of Civil war.

The reconstruction plan of Andrew Johnson consisted of abolishing the slavery system in the South and allowing the southerners to adopt freedom and promised to the Union in paying their debts. These were the additions to the plan devised by Lincoln.

Therefore, the explanation provided in option B is the right answer.

Learn more about the Reconstruction period in the related link:

brainly.com/question/19158215

#SPJ1

8 0

1 year ago

What are the differences and similarities between Native American religion in North America and South America?

iris [78.8K]

Most native lived in tribes survived mainly on the natural resources of where they lived. There religion mostly relieved on a vibrating spirit world that focus on the things that they need to survive. They they didn't think they owned land they thought that it was something they could use. The differences in between tribes were: not all tribe had the same idea of social class,some had Matrilineal, and in other women were allowed to be religious leaders.

6 0

3 years ago

Please help!!! 2 and 4, I'll mark brainliest

Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

Explanation:

2 is A and 3 is B

3 0

2 years ago

The founding Fathers wanted to ensure that no one faction of the population could choose the president. How does the Supreme Cou

vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

The best answer to the question: How does the Supreme Court in the 2000 election challenge the original intent? Would be, A: Because the Supreme Court could be considered a faction.

Explanation:

Although essentially the Judicial branch was designed to become a neutral power, without any leanings towards a particular party, or a particular form of government, in the 2000 election, this line was crossed and many Americans started believing that this ideal of neutrality on the part of the Supreme Court, was crossed. Originally, the Court is supposed to become an interpreter of the Law, the U.S Constitution and other legislation, that impacts the outcomes of different activities in American life.

In the 2000 election, the Court had to intervene when a lawsuit was presented to challenge the election of George W. Bush as President, in the case Bush vs. Gore. The point was that in Florida´s election, it seemed that there had been a miscount of votes, which favored Bush, over Gore.

Although the initial suit was taken up by the Florida Supreme Court, the matter reached all the way to the U.S Supreme Court, and they stepped in, on account of supposed violations to the Fourteenth Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause. Arguing protection of Floridian voters´ rights, the Court stopped the counting and made a decision. In this form, they favored Bush, over Gore, and thus were considered to have become partisan. Something the Founding Fathers had not intended to happen when they Framed the Constitution. They became a faction at that point which highly favored Bush and his party, by basically giving him the Presidency.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers