Answer:
It is too far to read, please upload and I will answer :)
Explanation:
Aurangzeb did not respect his father and also throwed him to prison. Akbar was the third successor of the Bhabur the founder of the Mughal dynasty. Aurangzeb was the great grand son of Akbar and son of Shah jahan. Akabar did respected his parents and his Dynast and promoted the growth of his Dydnasty. He was one of the main reason why Mughal empire lost it’s power. Thus aurangzeb is totaly different from akbar. Mughal rulers', Akbar and Aurangzeb, policies were motivated by religious fluidity by Akbar who created a diverse, accepting, and highly successful empire while Aurangzeb's religious rigidity was the downfall of the Mughals. Akbar was very against having one religion in charge, eliminated the Jizya, made Persian the official language, established the Ibadat Khana and the Divine Faith in Fatehpur, combined religions. Aurangzeb returned to religious orthodoxy and reestablished the Jizya, resulted in revolts of sikhs and hindus and ultimately led to the downfall of the empire.
It’s Philip Nolan or the last one
Unlike the electoral college system for the president, the procedures for nominating presidential candidates are not spelled out in the constitution. the movement is to encourage people who considered themselves as partisans to participate in their party's presidential selection process was short lived, however.
A African Slaves because at that time the south was popular for African slaves
Answer:
Explanation:
The Soviet Union was a socialist state where the state-owned significant means of production and property. In capitalist countries like the U.S., the property can be private and businesses can be individual. The soviet economy focused on equity of wealth and its balanced distribution among the people.