Your answer should be C.
They aren't necessarily cheaper, nor does it matter about the quantity, they also don't help the land much.
Antifederalist saw the Constitution as a way for the Federalist to gain more control over the states. This was seen as the opposite for the Federalist Party because they just wanted to create a central government that was strong enough to run the whole country. The Antifederalist Party was totally against the ratification because they were afraid that the national government would become too powerful and take advantage of their power. The Federalist Party was for the Constitution because they saw it as a way for the people to get more involved in the government since the most powerful branch would be directly linked to the people. Lastly, the Antifederalists saw the Constitution as a way to take the power of the states away while the Federalists interpreted the Constitution as a way for the states and the national government to have similar powers that still allow the national government to handle national affairs rather than having the states do it.
5 b yes orange yep that’s the answer
step by step explanation is that i’m doing this for points!
hope it helped
We need a picture of the explanation to answer this question
It's A) the US must be a leader in innovation in order to help steer its course.
