1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SCORPION-xisa [38]
2 years ago
6

The majority of state court cases begin in what court?

History
2 answers:
fiasKO [112]2 years ago
5 0
Cases in state courts begin in a trial court where lawsuits and criminal cases are filed and evidence is eventually presented if a case proceeds to a hearing or trial.
7nadin3 [17]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Cases in state courts begin in a trial court

Explanation:

If you need a more in-depth explaination, just let me know!

You might be interested in
Why did Martin Luther King decide to not join the Freedom Riders protest?
Darya [45]

Answer:

The pivotal meeting signaled a generation gap in the civil rights movement that endured through its existence. King had never participated in the Freedom Rides and, for some, this signaled a reluctance on his part to put his life in direct risk. That he may have felt too important to join others in the field.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following about slavery in ancient Rome is correct?
Vinil7 [7]
<span>Among the choices given, the statement about slavery in ancient Rome that is correct is letter A, both nobles and common people owned slaves in Rome. Slavery in ancient Rome assumed a critical part in the public eye and the economy. Bookkeepers and doctors were frequently slaves. Greek slaves specifically may be very instructed. Untalented slaves, or those sentenced to subjection as a discipline, dealt with homesteads, in mines, and at factories.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
2 years ago
How do political parties influence the political process?​
Illusion [34]

Answer:

In politics, a political party is an organized group of people who have the same ideology, or who otherwise have the same political positions, and who field candidates for elections, in an attempt to get them elected and thereby implement their agenda.

Explanation:

I hope this helps and pls mark me brainliest :)

8 0
2 years ago
Why did the British march on Lexington and Concord?
AysviL [449]

Answer:

Explanation:

There were a few reasons why General Gage sent his British troops to Lexington and Concord in 1775. The British had heard that the colonists were storing gunpowder in Concord. They wanted to move to Concord to capture the gunpowder.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which country acquired Guyana?
    6·1 answer
  • What is one way that imperialism affected the economic situations of colonial people?
    13·2 answers
  • What actions did the First Continental Congress take?have support deatil.
    7·1 answer
  • I only have 18 points right now but if you answer, I'll give you brainiest and I'll make more points and post more easy question
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the best example of a major dispute during the Constitutional Convention
    11·1 answer
  • One of the main reasons for European exploration was the desire to find a water route to
    11·2 answers
  • Qin Shin Huang united Chinas different regions by
    9·1 answer
  • What did Buddhist monasteries provide people?
    15·2 answers
  • Give two consequences of the California Gold Rush 1849 (8 marks)
    15·1 answer
  • Haircuts are an example of inelastic supplu true or false
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!