The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the process of creation, I think artists should follow a set of ethics because although the expression of art is subjective, it should respect the moral, religious, and belief systems of other people.
I know this is a complex and controversial subject because art is supposed to be a free expression of any topic, at the end, artists should be cautious of not offending "core" belief systems or critical issues that exist in society. Otherwise, people will be offended and can act against the artist or artistic expression.
So in conclusion, artists should follow a code of ethics. They can express criticism on any specific subject but that does not mean that they have to be rude or offend other people's ideas, culture, customs, or traditions.
The study of Japanese art has frequently been complicated by the definitions and expectations established in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when Japan was opened to the West. The occasion of dramatically increased interaction with other cultures<span> seemed to require a convenient summary of Japanese </span>aesthetic<span> principles, and Japanese art historians and archaeologists began to construct </span>methodologies<span> to categorize and assess a vast body of material ranging from Neolithic pottery to wood-block prints. Formulated in part from contemporary scholarly </span>assessments<span> and in part from the syntheses of enthusiastic generalists, these theories on the characteristics of Japanese </span>culture<span> and, more</span>
An orchestra is defined as a large instrumental ensemble typical of classical music. An orchestra features bass, brass, strings, woodwinds, and percussions. In the list given above, the section that is not one of the four groups in the orchestral palette is the voices. The answer would be "voices".
