Answer:
Explanation:
The Debate over Ratification Those who supported the Constitution became known as federalists and those who opposed its ratification were called antifederalists. ... The antifederalists favored strong state governments and believed that the national government created by the Constitution was too strong.
Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
The amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were designed to protect the basic rights of U.S. citizens, guaranteeing the freedom of speech, press, assembly, and exercise of religion; the right to fair legal procedure and to bear arms; and that powers not delegated to the federal government were reserved for the states ...
The Proclamation applied in the ten states that were still in rebellion in 1863, and thus did not cover the nearly 500,000 slaves in the slave-holding border states (Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland or Delaware) that had not seceded. Those slaves were freed by later separate state and federal actions.
I believe it would be B. They had the same type of government. The Soviet Union was very well known for being communist, especially during the Cold War it was known that the U.S. and the Soviet Union had nuclear weapons and were powerful superpowers. According to the way the governments were run at the time, their economic systems were different. Thus, B) They had the same type of government would be untrue, false.<span />
Answer:
A good example would be a letter from a person who was affected by this fire, as it would give an account of someone who has actually experienced the event. Alternatively, a newspaper article, but only if written by a person who has witnessed it, from a first person perspective.
Explanation:
