1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Archy [21]
3 years ago
10

Explain in one to two sentences how US involvement in World War II represented a shift form isolationism to intervention.

History
2 answers:
AURORKA [14]3 years ago
6 0
Because compared to previous time periods, now the US actively interfered in what was happening in Europe as well as around other places in the world. This was the main difference that distinguised isolationism from intervention.
maria [59]3 years ago
4 0

Faced with economical hardship, the United States decided that it would remain away from the war on fascists at all costs.

Ultimately, the fear from fascism triggered the Americans to support putting an end to that "evil" in the other side of the world before it could even reach them.

You might be interested in
_____ is the term used to describe the formation of one culture in the United States.
stepladder [879]
Apartheid thank you so much
7 0
3 years ago
Which explains why the United States issued an embargo on Japanese trade in 1941?
Alexandra [31]

Answer:

Japanese aggressor’s conquered Allied colonies in the Pacific.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Industrialization had which of the following effects on American society?
Slav-nsk [51]
Industrialization is the main cause of urbanization in America, and one of reasons for America no longer being a farm dependent economy. Industrialization is also a reason for many technological advances and introduced the American economy of being able to own businesses and factories for profit.
3 0
3 years ago
What is depicted in the image above?
Alika [10]
Please add an picture so I can help




Yea
5 0
3 years ago
Which is an issue that is debated by modern-day sociologists?
o-na [289]

Answer:

C. The appropriate balance between observing social injustice and seeking social justice.

Explanation:

This issue is strongly debated by modern-day sociologists, because our social order seems to be innately unjust. There are people who start from worse premises than others, there are people who earn less than others and people who will earn more and there is no society without inequality.

<em>This inequality is considered "social injustice" by modern-day sociologists and philosophers, whereas other voices claim that this kind of "injustice" is not something which can be corrected. </em>

<em>The main idea is that there will always be inequalities in any given society. </em>However, <u>the big question is how big these inequalities should be and how much state interference should there be to diminish these inequalities? </u>Moreover, even with state interference, could inequalities ever be wiped out?

This is what modern-day sociologists are trying to answer, in order to build better societies without imposing too many things on individuals who are faring better than others just by birth.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • There are 5 dogs and 3 cats per city block how many cats and dogs in 11 blocks
    10·1 answer
  • Which school of jurisprudential thought is reflected in documents such as the u.s. constitution, the magna carta, and the united
    7·1 answer
  • If a bill passes the House of Representatives, it ___________.
    15·1 answer
  • Who won at the battle of mid way
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following programs were created during FDR's administration?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the United States' lend-lease program support the Allies?
    12·2 answers
  • What organization was established to prevent strikes during WWI? *
    8·2 answers
  • How did Russia become primarily Orthodox?
    10·2 answers
  • Defacto segregation is segregation by custom and tradition rather than by law. true or false plz help! 20 points!!
    13·1 answer
  • Why did some Georgia employees take furloughs in 2009 and 2010? The government wanted to collect more income taxes, so it called
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!