The author argues for broadening the scope of what is considered literature and what is okay to teach in classrooms.
Explanation:
The author's argument is that the television and film have been forays old enough to be morally and culturally significant as literature as a large population grows up with exposure to it and its existence shapes their worldview too.
Thus it can be taught in the schools to show what is good and what is not on these forms too as well as to understand what is important in cultural context in these art forms too and what must be preserved as a society.
Answer: A: “You call yourself poor, my friend; you never were so rich,—you never knew the boundaries treasures of excellence you possessed in that woman.”
Explanation:
I believe the best answer for this question would be D, "archetype." A femme fatale is a character who appears in many works of literature, although she takes on different forms. She possesses many of the same qualities and performs largely the same actions, making her an archetype. She may or may not be symbolic, solitary, or heroic, which means you can rule these options out as your answer because they are not definitive. Other examples of archetypes are the hero, the wicked witch, the wise old man, etc. Hope this helps.
Answer:
Second response "to entertain"
The excerpt isn't persuading the audience to speak out or tell others about censorship, nor is it informing us about censorship. The excerpt includes a comparison of tortillas and poetry, not motivation to speak against censorship.
