The case citation People v. Jones, 65 Cal App. 2d 381, is an example of a case decided in which one of the following courts

1 answer:

5 0

That is the California Appellate Court.
The California Appellate Court is the higher court in the state of California and it rests above the regular trial courts. This court primarily deals with the cases that have already passed the trial court and decides whether there was something wrong with the ruling or the process itself. In this case the court was deciding whether the defendant was able to defend himself in the court.
<span />

You might be interested in

Importance on voting

OLga [1]

Ok the same question :/

6 0

4 years ago

Explain what opponent-process theory would predict that you would see if you stare for a minute at a flag with alternating yello

Charra [1.4K]

Answer: you would see an afterimage of a flag with the opposing colour systems(blue,black and red in middle), then white surface of the paper

Explanation: The opponent-process theory states that the cone photoreceptors are linked together to form three opposing colour pairs: blue/yellow, red/green, and black/white and the activation of one member of the pair inhibits activity in the other.

So after staring at a white sheet of paper for a minute, the yellow, white and green parts of the three opponent-process systems would be fatigued and unable to oppose the blue, black and red parts of these systems when you stare at the white sheet of paper. Therefore after seeing white, you would see an afterimage of a flag with alternating blue and black stripes and a block of red in the middle. Once the opposing parts of the three systems recovered, the flag afterimage would disappear and you would then see the white surface of the paper.

6 0

3 years ago

Inflation is a sustained rise in the general level of prices of goods and services.

Gala2k [10]

Answer:

should be true,Hope that helps.

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

No inductive argument can arrive at a logically certain conclusion, i.e. in which the conclusion is necessarily true.?

Sindrei [870]

No amount of inductive evidence can ensure the conclusion; inductive conclusions are not logical requirements. This is due to the fact that there is no way to be certain that all relevant evidence has been acquired and that there are no more bits of undetected evidence that could refute my theory.

<h3>The inductive technique is what?</h3>

We describe the inductive method's purpose and properties. What difficulties it causes and how it works. The inductive technique is what? The inductive method is a technique used to infer generalizations from specific data. The majority of scientists employ it. Inductivism shifts focus from the specific to the broad.

<h3>What is Inductive reasoning?</h3>

Inductive reasoning is a logical technique for drawing inferences or conclusions. Inductive reasoning is frequently employed informally in everyday situations. Three statements can be used to demonstrate inductive reasoning, as you may have seen. These start with a specific observation and then go through a significant pattern before drawing a conclusion.

Learn more about Inductive reasoning:

brainly.com/question/22077946

#SPJ4

6 0

2 years ago

Why must we treat all people as our own?

Eduardwww [97]

Answer:

Each of us is exceptional in our own way, but we all share similar traits that make us human. As a consequence, each of us should be treated with honesty and reverence, and we should treat others the same way. Both their sexual and reproductive life, no one should be discriminated against.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers