Answer:
The overview of the given situation is described in the explanation section below.
Explanation:
(1)...
The actual exchange rate from either the viewpoint of U.S:
= 0.867
<u>Working:</u>
As per the British automobiles cost will be:
= £20,000 x $1.50/£ or $30,000
And the US car's cost compares to either the Uk car will be:
=
=
It demonstrates that the US car seems to be cheaper or affordable.
(2)...
From either the Uk view the actual exchange rate will be:
= 1.154
<u>Working: </u>
US automobile worth in pounds is equivalent to,
=
= £17,333.
The Uk vehicle's price compared to the US car currently amounts to,
=
=
(3)...
Cars or Automobiles are competitively priced in the US.
<u>Explanation:</u>
British vehicle exceeds,
=
= compared to the U.S car.
It also means that perhaps the British car is much more costly, and as such the U.S. car becomes valued more highly competitive.
Answer:
Option e (oligopolistic) is the appropriate solution.
Explanation:
- The oligopoly would be a market governed by those few companies. There are several companies throughout this industry that offer relatively homogenous either separated goods.
- Often, since there are very few retailers on the marketplace, each seller affects the actions of several other companies and perhaps other businesses.
Some other available scenarios aren't relevant to the situation in question. That's the correct above.
The thing which was seen as a <em>sign </em>of the most power and influence among European nations was imperialism as this was seen as an important factor because the<em> European nations </em>wanted to extend their influence to other places.
As a result of this, we can see that imperialism as a term is the use of military force or other means to gain control over a group of people on their land and rule over them.
This was seen as a sign of great power among the European nations as this was a good advantage as they were able to exploit the resources of the lands which they had conquered.
Read more about imperialism here:
brainly.com/question/3999787
No, Pam will not succeed.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Pam will not succeed in the case in which she had sued the lottery office for claiming her lottery money which she had won. The reason for this is that she had lottery ticket.
And the rules of the contract of the lottery say that the ticket of the lottery must be shown if the amount of the lottery has to be claimed by the winner. Since Pam had accepted that rule when she had entered in to the contract, so now she has no right to sue the lottery office.
All of the above are regulated :)