Answer: 2/4 or 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
M=rise/run
-2/4 +1
2/4
1/2
Answer:
B. 6x - 12y + 10x
Step-by-step explanation:
A: expression equals 10x - 12y, doesn't equal step 2
B: expression equals 16x - 12y, is the same as step 2
C: expression equals 16x - 30y, doesn't equal step 2
D: expression equals 25x - 30y, doesn't equal step 2
Answer:
A. 6 and 30
B. 8 and 28
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that the area of the three squares must satisfy the Pythagorean Theorem so c² = a² + b²
where
c² is the area of the largest square
a² and b² are the areas of the smaller squares
now.. 36² = a² + b2
The sum of the areas of the smaller squares must be equal to 36
therefore
6 and 30 >>>> could be the areas of the smaller squares (6 + 30 = 36)
8 and 28 >>>> could be the areas of the smaller squares (8 + 28 = 36)
hope it clears your mind.
Please mark as the brainliest
300 is the answer
(I hope it is correct)
Answer:
a) point estimate is 30%
b) null and alternative hypothesis would be
: p=27%
: p>27%
c) We reject the null hypothesis, percentage working people aged 65-69 had increased
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>a. </em>
Point estimate would be the proportion of the working people aged 65–69 to the sample size and equals
ie 30%
<em>b.</em>
Let p be the proportion of people aged 65–69 who is working. OECD claims that percentage working had increased. Then null and alternative hypothesis would be
: p=27%
: p>27%
<em>c.</em>
z-score of the sample proportion assuming null hypothesis is:
where
- p(s) is the sample proportion of working people aged 65–69 (0.3)
- p is the proportion assumed under null hypothesis. (0.27)
- N is the sample size (600)
then z=
= 1.655
Since one tailed p value of 1.655 = 0.048 < 0.05, sample proportion is significantly different than the proportion assumed in null hypothesis. Therefore we reject the null hypothesis.