Answer:
A.
Explanation:
And I quote, " Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with, or even before, the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding ". The war, as we know, Lincoln was opposed to. He didn't want it to happen. But he felt as if it had too, if slavery was to be domlished, but it ended up in a much longer and bloodier war then he and the south had hope for.
The preamble of the Constitution is the part through which the US constitution establishes that the government derives its power from the people. It also introduces the six motives of the government in serving the people.
The fundamental purposes and guiding principles are briefly stated in the preamble. The preamble of the US Constitution does not serve as the power provider to the fundamental government neither it put some specific limitations on the government's action. Due to the limited or restricted nature and due to this no court has ever use it as a conclusive factor.
The group that joined exclusively with the confederacy during the Civil War is the Mexican Americans,
<h3>What is Confederacy?</h3>
Confederacy also known as the Confederate States of America, was an unrecognized breakaway republic in North America that existed from February 8, 1861, to May 9, 1865.
During the civil war, the Mexican American group exclusively joined the Confederate States of America. They were unrecognized during the war that lasted from the year 1861 to 1865.
Learn more about Confederacy here:
brainly.com/question/951920
Nazi Germany was chaotic. Wide spread racism was apparent in the air towards Jews, Gypsies, Bisexuals, and many more minorities. Hitler brainwashed all his followers into believing in an autocratic government which ensured it's followers in permanent prosperous in the near future. Nazi Germany was well known around the world, making it have many enemies (and some allies) at that time. Nazi Germany will be forever known. Hope this helped :)
Answer:
Some of the strengths of Athenian democracy include making decisions based on the opinions of many rather than a few, giving responsibility to more citizens and making records available for public examination.
Explanation:
Weaknesses include the voters' ability to make poor decisions and be swayed by rhetoric and short office terms that made implementing policies difficult.