If an important resource, such as oil, becomes unavailable, the production possibilities curve a. shift inwards.
"The production possibility frontier (PPF) is a curve on a graph that depicts the possible amount that can be produced or made of two products, if both are based upon the same limited resource for their creation. The Production Possibility Frontier is also termed as the production possibility curve. If it shifts inwards, it means the economy is shrinking due to a collapse in issuing resources and production capacity."
"The production possibility curve (PPC )is necessary because it helps in indicating the maximum possible production of items , in fixed resources. In macroeconomics, economists study and support a country or other organization's economic activity with its help."
To learn more about Production Possibility Curve,
brainly.com/question/28483084
#SPJ1
The Querechos or Apaches.
The Wichitas fought wars with other tribes. They didn't fight over territory, but instead to prove their courage. Some tribes the Wichitas frequently fought and consider their <em>enemies</em> were the Apaches.
During the end of the Spanish rule, the Apaches staged constant attacks against the Spanish missions. But as de 1700s wore on, they found themselves subject to attacking from the fearsome Comanches. Eventually, they entered an on-again, off-again relationship with the Spanish, sometimes warring and attacking, other times <em>allying with the Spanish</em> against the Comanches and other enemies. Those peace efforts with the Spanish resulted in the establishment of Spanish missions.
Answer:
Throughout the clarification segment elsewhere here, the definition including its concern is mentioned.
Explanation:
- Through me, the demand for amounts of unhealthy food seems to be inelastic in terms of costs. I acknowledge that as the cost goes up, consumers will consume less junk food, but perhaps the decrease in the supply is lower than that of the rising rise. It might be because, already though, substitutes for junk foods, particularly across the Us, are challenging to find. Unhealthy food is just the shortest and simplest meal to consume.
- The reasoning here seems to be that every customer would have to purchase food even though the price rises by 1%, so consumption will still decrease by somewhere around 1%. So perhaps we can assume that quality does not influence quantities throughout the Junk Food industry.
- The reduction of excess baggage would be small since it is inelastic. This symbolizes the corporation's low incompetence and as the cost is changed, the market for quantities is approximately the same, not so much impact.
- I thought taxing junk foods, especially to maximize welfare spending, is a smart option. But obesity over here Is not going to help. The incorrect method for combating obesity as well as making our diets balanced is taxes. The irony is that all clients are impacted by taxes regardless of their weight status. The impact of food taxes is unclear and may result in the replacement of items that may comprise of calories that seem to be equivalent or higher.
No it's either you Christian or Catholic you can't be both at the same time unless you wanna change religions.
Answer:
three-fourths of the states must agree to change the constitution
