The economic value of having colonies in the first place was for 3 main reasons
1) attain cheap labour from the native peoples
2) acquire cheap raw materials to bring to the homeland (Europe)
3) open up new markets to trade with
the first two were vital in Britains industrial revolution. Without cheap raw materials, and cheap labourers, the factories and refineries in Britain would have costed far more to maintain and keep supplied. This, in turn, would have slowed down production considerably. There is no doubt in my mind that the industrial revolution would still have taken place in Britain with or without the colonies, but WITH the colonies the process was sped up considerably.
Overall, cheap labour and raw materials attained through Britains colonial interests sped up the industrialisation of the UK.
The
principle that is evident through the "necessary and proper
clause" in the U.S. Constitution is the rule of law. The correct answer
between all the choices given is the first choice. I am hoping that this answer
has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and
if you would like, feel free to ask another question.
It is Islam. The Mughal Empire was established by Babur, a Central Asian ruler who was slipped from the Turco-Mongol champion Timur on his dad's side and from Chagatai, the second child of the Mongol ruler Genghis Khan, on his mom's side.
Mughal Empire started to decay subsequently to accomplishing its most elevated purpose of achievement and strength. Amid this time, the realm was under the authority of Shah Jahan and his child, after a fruitful manage of Aurangzeb. History records that the decrease of Mughal Empire started towards the finish of Aurangzeb's run the show.
The oil embargo of 1973 forced the U.S. to ration gasoline for a time.
The ANSWER IS .. ( tar, timber , iron , cordage) your welcome :)
