Answer:
Late Majority.
Explanation:
The adoption of a product by consumers is divided into five categories, namely, <u>innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards</u>. Such customers are known as adopters who adopt to new technology differently. The category of adopters was proposed by Everett Rogers in 1962.
In the given scenario, Emy exemplifies Late majority adopter.
Late Majority adopters are those adopters who adopts new innovation or technology after observing that the product has been adopted fruitfully by the majority of society. They rank on the second last position of the adopters. They are more skeptical to the product before adopting it. So, Emy fits the late majority category of adopters as she is skeptical about the fancy device shown by her friend.
Answer:
Explanation: The marketing mix consists of a number of factors that a producer usually exploits in order to influence consumers to purchase his/her products and services.
The marketing mix consists of:
- Product
- Price
- Place
- Promotion.
The above are usually called the 4Ps of marketing.
Of the four factors of the marketing mix, the factor that will the easiest for Lee to change will be the price.
This is because, often times, the price of a product or service will be the major determinant in the success of said commodity, and this is due to the fact that customers will compare the product being offered with its price in order to judge whether the product is worthy of the value placed on it.
Therefore, in order for Lee to influence the potential customers to make purchases, the price of the software program will be the easiest to be reviewed, and it should be set to a level where potential customers will be influenced to exchange their money for the software program.
Answer:
I think C is correct answer
Answer:
a. Variable costing income from operations <u>is greater than </u>absorption costing income from operations.
b. $870,000
Explanation:
a. Under Variable costing, only the variable manufacturing costs are apportioned to the units produced.
Cost under Variable costing are;
= 114 * 14,500
= $1,653,000
Under Absorption Costing, both fixed and variable costs are apportioned to the units produced.
Cost therefore is;
= (114 + 60) * 14,500
= $2,523,000
Variable costing income from operations is greater than absorption costing income from operations because Absorption costs yields more cost.
b.= Absorption cost - Variable cost
= 2,523,000 - 1,653,000
= $870,000
<em>Variable costing income from operation will be $870,000 higher than Absorption costing income from operations.</em>
