All categories

3 years ago

Which is higher: CEO or CFO Thanks

2 answers:

7 0

I believe it is the CEO which is the higher. It stands for chief executive officer. For CFO it is chief financial officer.

ankoles [38]3 years ago

3 0

CEO is higher than CFO.

Depending on the size of the business/corporation, a CEO can have higher or limited impact. CEO stands for Chief Executive Officer, who generally deal with a broad array of higher-level tasks. Another name for CEO can be known as 'president'.

CFO stands for Chief Financial Officer. If the name doesn't already give the definition of it up, the CFO takes care of the financial activities of the company. The CFO usually has a great contact with the president (CEO) of the organization to make sure that everything financial-wise is going alright.

To answer your question, CEO is higher than CFO. Chief Executive Officer runs the show while Chief Financial Officer takes care of anything financial.

You might be interested in

A full summary of all consecutive grants, conveyances, wills, records, and judicial proceedings affecting title to a specific pa

Bad White [126]

Answer:

B) Abstract and opinion.

Explanation:

Abstract and opinion can also be call Abstract of title:

this is the records or evidence of the full history of the property from the conveyance,wills, legal backing, and the list of those people that as assume ownership of the property for a particular period of time.

A full summary of all consecutive grants, conveyances, wills, records, and judicial proceedings affecting title to a specific parcel of real estate, together with a statement of all recorded liens and encumbrances affecting the property and their present status, but not including encroachments and forgeries, is known as a Abstract of Title or Abstract and opinion.

6 0

3 years ago

Waupaca Company establishes a $440 petty cash fund on September 9. On September 30, the fund shows $188 in cash along with recei

Simora [160]

Answer:

September 9, petty cash fund is established

Dr Petty cash 440

Cr Cash 440

September 30, petty cash fund expenses

Dr Merchandise inventory 44

Dr Postage expenses 54

Dr Miscellaneous office expenses 144

Dr Cash short and over 10

Cr Petty cash 252

September 30, petty cash fund reimbursement

Dr Petty cash 252

Cr Cash 252

October 1, petty cash fund increased to $485

Dr Petty cash 45

Cr Cash 45

6 0

2 years ago

When there is no room for growth within a company, an employee cannot __________. a. Be promoted to new positions horizontally b

Sholpan [36]

D. be promoted vertically to new positions

7 0

1 year ago

You produce widgets for sale in a perfectly com- petitive market at a market price of $10 per wid- get. Your widgets are manufac

mihalych1998 [28]

Answer: No.

Explanation:

This is a Perfectly Competitive market and that means that you are a price taker who maximises output at a point where Marginal Revenue equals Marginal Cost ( MR = MC). As costs have gone up, it simply means that for the conditions to be satisfied, you need to produce less at the factory in Connecticut.

That does not mean that you have to produce more at the Massachusetts plant because it is already producing at capacity and increasing the marginal cost would violate the MR=MC rule as you have no control over the price so you cannot change Marginal Revenue. It is therefore better to keep the production level at the Massachusetts plant unchanged.

6 0

3 years ago

Earnhardt Driving School's 2008 balance sheet showed net fixed assets of $4 million, and the 2009 balance sheet showed net fixed

harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

Net capital spending = $2,985,000

Explanation:

There are two financial years in consideration

They are 2008 and 2009

Closing values of 2008 = Opening values of 2009

Now, closing value of net assets at 2008 = $4 million

Closing value of net assets for 2009 = $6.2 million

Net capital spending = Gross fixed assets at year end - Opening fixed assets

Gross fixed assets = Net Value + Depreciation

= $6.2 million + $785,000

= $6,985,000

Thus, Net capital spending in 2009 = $6,985,000 - $4,000,000

= $2,985,000

4 0

3 years ago