It is inductive reasoning: generalizing from a small sample to a bigger population. Deductive reasoning would be, if the sentences were in the other order. It's also not faulty, as it's not contradictory.
The war on terror is a war fought in the <em>mind. </em>Terrorist ideologies are held in the minds of individuals willing to carry out attacks on any given target with the intent of spreading fear and a message. The war in Vietnam may have been to combat communism, but we left after a certain while. We weren't contentiously attacked by Viet Cong after pulling out of the area, like we are by terrorists. The war on terror is a war that will <em>never </em>end, as the war's main "general" is in the mind, and you cannot wage war on the thoughts of individuals.
Answer:
Given g(x)=3x+8, what is the value of g(-4)?
Explanation:
only thing i can give you is my dlck if you are a girl no homo if you are a boy
Answer:
B) Mountains protected the region from invaders and D) Rivers flooded, providing fertile soil and water for irrigation.
Explanation:
hope i helped you out !!!
