There was nothing in the house to demand care, to claim attention, to cumber my consciousness with it's insistent, unchanging companionship.
<u>Explanation:</u>
This line in the passage shows that the things in the house are a burden. There was nothing in the house that could give care or attention to the people and were all materialistic things.
All this tells us that the things were not to be with the people and were all materialistic. They could not give companionship, love and care to the people and were only considered as a burden.
Answer:
I would take my chances that way if I had to fight for love, freedom or security.
Explanation:
From the context of your question, we can assume that you are referring to the play "Romeo and Juliet" where Juliet takes her place in the family by marrying in secret to Romeo, who belonged to an enemy family of hers.
As stated in the question, Juliet lived in a society where she was completely dependent on her parents and had neither permission nor authority to make any decisions about her life. However, she faced it out of love. I believe that, in my case, I would take the same risk as she if I knew true love, as she did. Also, I would take a risk that way, to protect someone in the family, or to get rid of a very negative situation. Those would be the only ways I would break the authority of my family that I was dependent on.
Answer:
Nemur thinks that IQ shows a person how intelligent they are, but Dr. Strauss believed that an IQ test told a person how much intelligence you could get, not how much they currently possess.
<em>Plz mark Brainliest. Thanks.</em>
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I'm taking the same test right now, if you get done please help me out, I've only got the first 14 questions answered.
what's the question because you didn't attach anything
