Rural or nation-state locations are the ones in mare far off + much less densely populated via evaluation Very faraway Rural areas include three percent of the populace, however cowl nearly 1/2 of the land place.
A rural area is an open swath of land that has few homes or different buildings, and now not very many people. A rural region's populace density may be very low. Many humans live in a town or urban area. Their homes and companies are placed very close to one another.
In keeping with the modern delineation, released in 2012 and primarily based on the 2010 decennial census, rural areas include open USA and settlements with fewer than 2,500 residents. urban regions comprise larger places and densely settled areas around them. urban regions do not necessarily observe municipal limitations.
A rural area is an open swath of land that has few homes or different buildings, and not very many human beings. A rural area's populace density is very low. Many people stay in a metropolis or urban vicinity. Their houses and corporations are placed very near each other.
Learn more about rural areas here: brainly.com/question/16927480
#SPJ9
Most likely would be a democratic system.
Answer:
purchase order
Explanation:
a document that authorizes a supplier to deliver a product or service is known as a purchase order is the purchased cost of goods from outside suppliers cost of goods sold is used when requirements are well understood and there is common agreement between supply chain partners about what certain terms mean
Answer:
20 shares of XYZ and 11 shares of the spin-off
Explanation:
The 20 shares of XYS comes from
= 200 shares × 10%
= 20 shares-
So, the total number of shares now is
= 200 shares + 20 shares
= 220 shares
And there is 5% spin off
So, the number of shares contains spin off is
= 220 shares × 5%
= 11 shares
This represents the separate company
hence, there is 20 shares of XYZ and 11 shares of the spin-off
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Under the at risk rules, the amount a tax payer has at risks at the year end is limited to the amount the taxpayer has at the end of the year.
The amount a taxpayer has at risk is increased by the taxpayer's income and decreased by the share of losses and withdrawal from the activity. For partnership, the at risk increases with an increase in debt and vice versa.
Jack's year-end at-risk amount = At risk amount - (interest *loss) = $42,000 - (10% × $60,000 loss) = $36,000