Answer:
Not steal from my family? Is this for real?
Explanation:
OK so you want to buy a cell phone, great. What about the data plan? Do you have enough income to pay for it every month?
If you don't, that means either your parents will pay it (in which case stealing is wrong) or you will have to earn more income to pay it (in which case stealing is wrong)
If you do, then you need to either save more or work more. Stealing is also wrong.
This is a pretty simple question to figure out. Your parents won't want to buy a cell phone for their kid that steals from them.
<span>Voluntarily yielding to social norms, even at the expense of one's own preference, is called "conformity".
</span>
Conformity is a sort of social impact including an adjustment in conviction or conduct keeping in mind the end goal to fit in with a gathering. This change is in light of genuine (including the physical nearness of others) or envisioned (including the weight of social standards/desires) group weight.
Answer:
1. Massachusetts, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia voted for the Virginia Plan, while New York, New Jersey, and Delaware voted for the New Jersey Plan, an alternate that was also on the table. The delegates from Maryland were split, so the state's vote was null.
2. The New Jersey Plan (also known as the Small State Plan or the Paterson Plan) was a proposal for the structure of the United States Government presented by William Paterson at the Constitutional Convention on June 15, 1787.[1] The plan was created in response to the Virginia Plan, which called for two houses of Congress, both elected with apportionment according to population.[2] The less populous states were adamantly opposed to giving most of the control of the national government to the more populous states, and so proposed an alternative plan that would have kept the one-vote-per-state representation under one legislative body from the Articles of Confederation.
3. Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth, both of the Connecticut delegation, created a compromise that, in a sense, blended the Virginia (large-state) and New Jersey (small-state) proposals regarding congressional apportionment.
Explanation:
Hope it help
Destructive criticism is a kind of criticism usually made in order to harm someone. It is used normally as a factor of defamation. It is used to hamper some one' reputation
Explanation:
Criticism is a gate way which provides a reader with clarity of thoughts and sometimes criticism can be too harsh that it would ruin the derogate and destroy the self esteem of a person who faces the criticism. No boy likes to be criticized, this is the fact and hence it depends largely on a person on how to react to a destructive criticism.
Analyse the relevance the criticism and decide how to resolve it when you observe that the criticism is relevant. The critic must not be too harsh while criticizing. He must be professional and turn his criticism in to a complaint which would make both the critic and the criticized to focus on the problem and solve it.