Answer:
a. Particulars Amount
Gross sales $925,000
Less: COGS <u>$490,000</u>
EBITDA $435,000
Less: Depreciation <u>$120,000</u>
EBIT $315,000
Less: Interest on notes payable <u>$8,800 </u> (220000*4%)
EBT $306,200
Less: Tax (35%*306200) <u>$107,170</u>
Net Income <u>$199,030</u>
<u />
b. Operating cash flow = Net income + Depreciation
Operating cash flow = $199,030 + $120,000
Operating cash flow = $319,030
Stores can make sure their employees are being incentivized when what they do benefits the customer and the store as a whole. Their main goal is to serve the customer because a happy customer comes back and refers their fiends. The employees can be rewarded on referral base actions, feedback cards and other ways that show management they are being honest and truthful to the customer.
Answer:
(a) $33750000 (b) $11250000 (c) $22500000
Explanation:
Solution
(a) How much would Ziegler Inc. total income of operating increase.
Now,
Units * (Cost of purchased from outside supplier - Variable cost)
Thus,
75000 * ($1350 - $900) = $33750000
(b) How much would the Instrument Division's operating income increase
Now,
The Units * (Cost of purchased from outside supplier - Transfer Price)
So,
75000 units * ($1350 - $1200) = $11250000
(C) How much would the Components Division's operating income increase?
Now,
Units * (Transfer Price - Variable cost)
75000 units * ($1200 - $900) = $22500000
Answer:
Supply side is the view point of the Firms or the Businesses.
Explanation:
As the law of demand deals with the consumers side, the law of supply deals with the suppliers or the firms/businesses.
this tries to explain the factors that affect the supply, such as the prices of the substitutes and complements, the price of a commodity itself, taxes, government subsidies, technological influences, etc...
in this question, the 1st option, consumer is wrong. However, in certain situations, Government can be acted as a "supplier" (if there is a government monopoly on the supply of a good or a service", and government is a heavy influencer of supply through the implementaion of taxes and subsidies!
Answer:
The correct answer is D. will result in a multiple times higher decrease in equilibrium real GDP in the short run; however, a tax-rate reduction will increase the automatic-stabilizer properties of the tax system, so equilibrium real GDP would be less stable.
Explanation:
Ricardian Equivalence is an economic theory that suggests that when a government increases expenses financed with debt to try to stimulate demand, demand does not really undergo any change.
This is because increases in the public deficit will lead to higher taxes in the future. To keep their consumption pattern stable, taxpayers will reduce consumption and increase their savings in order to offset the cost of this future tax increase.
If taxpayers reduce their consumption and increase their savings by the same amount as the debt to be returned by the government, there is no effect on aggregate demand.
The fundamental concept of Ricardian equivalence is that it does not matter which method the government chooses to increase spending, whether by issuing public debt or through taxes (applying an expansive fiscal policy), the result will be the same and demand will remain unchanged.
