Answer:
The issue is whether Joe is liable to pay for Bob to Avarice Bank or not.
Joe should prevail.
Explanation:
The original contract is between bank and Bob and in that contract Joe is not involved. Secondly payment on someone' behalf always has to be a written contract.
According to UCC, suretyships have to be written for them to be enforceable. This is mentioned in Statute of Frauds. It clearly states that any gurantee by thrid party for payment of debts has to be in writing.
Federal reserve notes are the marks on money like the serial number, U.S emblems, and the signatures. They show that the money is an American Dollar.
Answer: Direct and indirect statement of cash flows
Explanation: statement of cash flows shows the overall computed inflow and outflow of cash that took place in an organization over a given period of time. It shows how well an organization managed it's cash which is used to settle it's debts and make profit.
The direct method only considers the cash inflow and outflow into account and produces the cash flow from it's operations.
The indirect method considers the net income as the starting point and prepare the inflow and outflow using adjustments.
<span>An allergic reaction should not be treated
lightly because this can actually result in death of the victim. So in this
casem this could actually lead to serious illness or death of the customer.
Which adds a very huge liability for the restaurant or organization.</span>