Answer:
At the First Continental Congress, it was decided to boycott all British goods and prepare for possible military action.
Explanation:
The First Continental Congress was a gathering of delegates appointed by the regional assemblies of the Thirteen Colonies in British North America in 1774. It only met briefly and then prepared his successor, the Second Continental Congress, which organized the American Revolutionary War. The two assemblies together formed the Continental Congress, which acted as the first de facto government in the United States. The First Continental Congress met in Philadelphia and had 56 members representing all colonies except Georgia.
Like the Stamp Act Congress, in which American colonists gathered to oppose the Stamp Act, the occasion for the First Continental Congress was the response to the Intolerable Acts of the British Crown.
During his meeting, the Congress achieved two major successes. The first was the commitment of the colonies to boycott British goods as of December 1, 1774. As a result, the total volume of imports from Great Britain fell by 97 percent in 1775. If the intolerable acts were not abolished, the colonies would no longer deliver to Great Britain after September 10, 1775.
The second success of the congress was the preparation of the Second Continental Congress, which was to be held on May 10, 1775.
Primary and secondary sources
Answer:
An author's<em> </em><u><em>point of view</em></u> describes the author's perspective or relationship to the material.
An author's <em><u>purpose</u></em> tells why he or she created the source.
Identifying an author's point of view and purpose can help a historian determine whether a source is <em><u>credible</u></em>.
Explanation:
An author's point of view refers to the perspective that an author has on the world or on the subject that he is discussing. This is usually influenced by the author's background and his experiences in life. On the other hand, the author's purpose refers to the reason or motivation why the author writes a particular text. When historians analyze a text in order to use it as a source, they look at both the point of view and the purpose of the author. These two elements can help the historian ascertain whether the source is to be trusted or not.
We Cant Exactly Write an essay for you but T<span>hink about Machiavelli’s ideas on political leadership. Is he right? Is he wrong? Should we expect our political leaders to always be virtuous as well as effective? Which is more important in a leader, virtue or effectiveness? Why? Write an essay explaining your answers to these questions. </span>
<span>Read and decide if he is right or wrong. Take point form notes to prove your point.
</span>
Hope it Helps Daniella!
