Okay and I’m confused. True?
Hello. You have not submitted the text to which this question refers. This makes it impossible for your question to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
It is only possible to answer this question by reading the two texts. Also, this is a personal question so first of all, you should reflect on what you think about the dangers that social media can offer to users. Do you think social media can influence you incorrectly? do you think social media can impose negative standards on society? Do you think that social media can promote exaggerated exposure? These are some concepts that you can reflect on to create your opinion about the dangers that social media can cause.
Then, you should read both texts and pay attention to how the authors approach these dangers and which author managed to present an argument that most closely resembles the opinion you have on this subject.
Therefore, you must answer this question by showing how you and this author present similar arguments and opinions.
Answer:
hello! your answer is c! i'm sorry this was late, i just saw this question!
(you don't have to mark me brainliest) just have a great day!
Explanation:
Answer:Group polarization
Explanation:
Group polarization is when a group which shares similar attitudes work together towards intensifying those attitudes more than they did when they had these ideas separately as individuals. Some intensified shared ideas may be risky such as when unrulyb mob gangs comes together to push their attitudes.
Some may breed fruitful actions such as mobilising together to protect the right of animals which may save lives of many animals.
Group Polarization makes an action possible that would have been impossible if someone was standing for the idea alone, numbers increase the strength of the idea to be implemented.
Group Polarization exist in order to give strength to persuasion, the attitude of a group is improved by their number more than it would if they were standing alone.
