I have attached a document I found that details the questioning of Joshua Drake. I based my answer from this document.
Joshua Drake allows his children to work in the textile factories because of NECESSITY.
Joshua Drake only works for 2 days. He has other means of income but these are not permanent nor are they enough to subsidize the needs of the family.
Everyone in the family needs to work in order for them to satisfy their most basic needs. That is why his children also work because what they earn goes to the family coffers.
For Joshua Drake, it is preferable to work limited hours and earn lower wages compared to working longer hours but is not regularly employed.
Answer:
The author starts the story with a more serious and somber tone, but ends the story with a lively and exciting tone.
Explanation:
"Po-No-Kah" begins with the history of the first English colonists in North America. This beginning has a dark, serious and sad tone, because, as we know, the Pioneers had many difficulties in establishing themselves in America, in addition to being an environment that did not promote enough resources for their survival, they had to be constantly alert, afraid that the natives would attack them.
The story ends, however, with the release of the Hadeeman family from their captors, this is a happy moment, where the whole family, with the exception of the pet dog, left unscathed. This part of the story has a happy and lively tone.
Answer:
The colonists protested the taxes because they thought they were unfair. The colonists had no representation in Parliament and they saw this as taxation without repesentation.
Explanation:
Answer:
Houston rejected the actions of the Texas Secession Convention, believing it had overstepped its authority in becoming a member state of the newly formed Confederacy. He refused to take an oath of allegiance to the Confederacy and was deposed from office.
Explanation:
Answer:
Senatorial courtesy is a long-standing unwritten, unofficial, and nonbinding constitutional convention in the United States describing the tendency of U.S. senators to support a Senate colleague when opposing the appointment to federal office of a nominee from that Senator's state.
Explanation: