<u>The story of Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde</u> is a mystery about the two friends Hyde and doctor Jekyll written by Robert Stevenson. It is a thriller and mystery drama investigated by the lawyer Utterson.
The line shows the conflict between the character vs. self.
<h3>The mystery novel can be explained as:</h3>
- The conflict is the obstruction of characters by other characters in success or development. In this excerpt, the conflict is between the lawyer and his perception about the other character Mr Hyde.
- The lawyer Utterson is a friend of doctor Jekyll and dislikes another character dear to the doctor named Mr Hyde.
- Siding with his conflict the lawyer agrees with the doctor to comply with his request and accepts the proposal with a sigh.
Therefore, it is character vs. self option c.
Learn more about The story of Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde here:
brainly.com/question/12701725
Answer:
B
Explanation:
In order to survive Auschwitz, prisoners did everything possible to survive, and this included celebrating holidays. A reminder to what they had survived in the past gives them hope in the face of adversity and pain.
Hey There!
Here is your answer:
Your answer is: A. Strong Willed
In Rosa parks bio she showed a lot of courage and which made her mark in U.S. history!
Your answer is strong willed!
If you need anymore help just ask me!
Hope this helps!
Complex because a complex sentence has 1+ fragments of a sentence, and 1+ complete ideas
My idea on cancel culture is that it can get extreme and unproductive when it gets toxic.
<h3>Cancel culture</h3>
Cancel culture is a way that people use to express their displeasure and anger over issues that they find dissatisfying.
It leads to ostracizing people or organizations due to their acts, behaviors or opinions.
Even though it can deter people and even organizations from posting offensive views, it could be negative most times.
- Cancel culture can get too far when the people are against anyone who has a different opinion from them.
- It could be regarded as toxic if it drives the other party to want to harm themselves
- If it involves invasion of privacy and threat.
It is not the best response for wrongdoing because there are other ways of tackling issues and disagreements without ostracizing the other person.
Read more on cancel culture on:
brainly.com/question/21840416?referrer=searchResults