Two firms, such as a small local, family-owned Italian restaurant and Olive Garden, share few markets and have little similarity in resources, but are nonetheless direct and mutually acknowledged competitors - False
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
A state of rivalry that exists between any company that sells identical or similar products and services refers to the competitors. There are two types of competitors such as direct and indirect competitors. Direct competitors are the firms that sells same kind of goods and services. They also focus on the same market segment and also customers.
Indirect competitors refers to those companies that sells similar goods and services but, they will not be having similar end goals. The given statement is false since the firms given are sharing only few of the markets and also have less similarity in the resources. Hence they cannot be competitors either directly or indirectly.
Answer;
A
Explanation:
two types of industries are made mention of in this question.
1)Local Fledgling Industries
2)Export Dependent Industries,who are being forced to buy products from local industries now.
Since the Government has placed a ban on the importation of the products that are being made by the local fledgling industries. The implication of this is that:
1. Buyers of those import products will experience a rise in the Cost of those products as the competition faced by the Fledging industries decreases.
2. Competing becomes difficult for Export dependent industries. This is because of inflation. They now have to buy the same product at an inflated cost, thereby reducing profits.
Answer:
d. economic contraction
Explanation:
Contraction is in economics means it is business cycle phase where the overall economu should be fall. Also the contraction should arise when the cycle of the business is in peak but it should be prior to became as a trough
So at the time of economic contraction, the company normally took the measures of the cost cutting
So as per the given situation, the option d is correct
It is possible 1 may sell more than the other or may be somewhat equal I would say false because the companies have different strategies they may each do better things than the other in certain aspects. I would say False but I apologize if I am wrong
Answer:
The answer is: C) There is a valid contract
Explanation:
According to Appellate Court ruling in Steinberg v. Chicago Medical School;
The two parties (Joe and Sate University) entered a valid contract agreement upon receiving the $100 dollar application fee from Joe. State University´s catalog is considered to be the Offer part of this contract and the $100 application fee is considered the Consideration part of the contract.
