Answer:
B. $6,448,519
Explanation:
The computation of the present value of this growing annuity is given below:
PVA = [Cash flow at year 1 ÷ (interest rate - growth rate)] × {1 - [(1 + growth rate) ÷ (1 + interest rate)^number of years}
= [$675,000 ÷ (0.18 - 0.13)] × [1 - (1.13 ÷ 1.18)^15]
= $6,448,519
Hence, the correct option is b.
Answer:
Lets see what are the double entries of borrowings and purchase of new manufacturing equipment and their implications:
Double Entry for borrowings:
Dr Bank $500,000
Cr Notes Payable $500,000
The above double entry shows that the total assets and Notes Payable are increased due to this transaction. Furthermore, in the Statement of Cash flow we see an increase in Cash from Financing activities and decrease in the Cash from investing activities.
The second transaction is purchase of new manufacturing equipment. It must be accounted for as under:
Dr Manufacturing Equipment $500,000
Cr Bank $500,000
This transaction shows that net impact on the total assets is same as one asset has been increased by spending the other asset. This transaction also has no impact on Cash for financing, inventories and notes payable balances. However, their is increased negative balance in cash from investing activities.
Answer:
Answer is option a, i.e. trade-offs and connections may differ in short run and the long run.
Explanation:
Keynes' law in economics and Say's law in economics are contradictory in their perspective. Where Keynes' law says that it is the demand that creates the supply, on the other hand, Say's law states that its the supply that tends to create the demand. But, we cannot neglect any of the above facts as demand and supply cant operate independently. So, on combining the two laws, we happen to take both the given laws into account. Also, it is found that Keynes' law is more appropriate and accurate for the short-run whereas, Say's law is for the long run. This thus creates trade-offs and connections that differ in the short-run and long-run by affecting the three important goals of macroeconomics, i.e. higher standard of living, low inflation, and low unemployment.
Answer:
The answer is monopolistic competition.
Explanation:
Monopolistic competition refers to a market type where there are several producers who sell the same type of products, but differentiated from one another; thus making their products unable to be substituted for one another. This is the case in the scenario at the question; though there are multiple companies producing natural and artificial flavorings, due to the different in how they taste, each company’s product cannot be substituted with one another’s.
Answer:
$ 600 per unit
Explanation:
Given:
selling price in the market = $ 600 per unit
From the given question it can be concluded that the firm is selling produce in the perfectly competitive market.
Now,
In the perfectly competitive market the marginal revenue is the selling price of the product.
Therefore, for the given question
the marginal revenue per unit = selling price = $ 600 per unit
