Answer:
The approach to resolving ethical dilemmas which Amy would most likely employ is:
utilitarian.
Explanation:
This ethical resolution approach presupposes that an action is right when it promotes happiness for the performer of the action and for everyone involved. This implies that the majority of the people involved derive maximum benefit from the action. This approach stresses that what is at stake is the utility or usefulness or value of an action, especially in relation to society as a whole and not just for an individual's selfish satisfaction.
Answer:
How can I help? Ypu have to say what to do
Answer:
a. of the letters the settlers wrote to relatives back in Spain.
Explanation:
San Antonio de Bexar was a historical fort that was built by the Spanish in what is now present-day San Antonio, Texas, US. This place became one of the earliest places of settlement in which the Spanish people came to enter into the American soil, through the process of assimilation and colonial settlement.
In<u> 1675, an expedition consisting of Fray Juan Larios, Fernando del Bosque, Fray Francisco Hidalgo, and Fray Antonio de Olivares </u>was sent by the Spanish crown to look into the possibility of establishing new settlements. It was through this expedition that led to the discovery of San Antonio. <u>Historians were able to learn about the intention of the explorers about making it a permanent settlement from the letters sent to relatives about the need to send more people to the settlement</u>.
Thus, the correct answer is option a.
I don't know what you mean, but it is a noun. Those branches of public service concerned with all governmental administrative functions outside the armed services. the body of persons employed in these branches. a system or method of appointing government employees on the basis of competitive examinations, rather than by political patronage.
Answer:
D. Judicial Activism
Explanation:
Judicial Activism is the judicial philosophy that argues the Court should go beyond the words of the Constitution or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.
It is the opposite of Judicial Restraint, as a judicial philosophy theory, which limits the power of judges to act only as per existing legal provisions under constitution.
