1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inessss [21]
3 years ago
7

Is the act of taking advantage of a weaker nation or person.

Social Studies
2 answers:
MatroZZZ [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Exploitation

Explanation:

I got this one right

IRISSAK [1]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Hi! If you are looking for the word whose meaning is defined by this sentence, I would say that the word you need is <em>exploitation</em>.

Explanation:

Let's remember that exploitation is the act of <u>making use of and benefiting from other's resources, it is the action or fact of treating someone unfairly in order to benefit from their work or abilities.</u> In this case, <em>it is exploitation because this nation or person is vulnerable</em> in some way and allow others to take advantage of their work, abilities, or any other characteristic that can be beneficial. They allow this exploitation probably because they don't have the tools to change their reality or because they don't know how or are under threat, maybe they are uneducated and don't even realize they are being used. <u>To do that to a person or to a nation is called exploitation.</u>

You might be interested in
Explain the law of increasing costs.
Arisa [49]

<em>Answer: In economics, the law of increasing costs is a principle that states that to produce an increasing amount of a good a supplier must give up greater and greater amounts of another good. ... If the economy is at the maximum for all inputs, then the cost of each unit will be more expensive.</em>

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1<br> What are the three major causes of the Russian Revolution?
PolarNik [594]

Answer:

Poor working conditions, low wages, and hazards of industrialization

hope this helps mate :)

5 0
3 years ago
why did framers of the constitution create the legislative branch with a bicameral structure ? ( essay… )
Pie

The founders established Congress as a bicameral legislature as a check against tyranny. They feared having any one governmental body become too strong. This bicameral system distributes power within two houses that check and balance one another rather than concentrating authority in a single body. The House of Representatives is the larger body with membership based on each state’s population. The Senate is the smaller body with each state having two delegates. With one hundred members, the Senate is a more intimate, less formal legislative body than the House, which has 435 members elected from districts that are roughly the same size in population.

Members of Congress must reside in the district or state that elects them, although the Constitution does not specify for how long. Residency can become a campaign issue, as it did when former first lady and current secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton, ran for a Senate seat from New York soon after leaving the White House, despite having never lived in the state. She was successful despite having to fend off criticism that as a carpetbagger she was not suited to represent New York’s interests in Congress. The term “carpetbagger” refers to a politician who runs for office from an area where he or she has lived for only a short time and has few community ties. It derives from a derogatory term coined after the Civil War referring to Northerners who went south to profit from the Reconstruction, carrying “carpet bags” for luggage. Members of Congress are elected locally to serve nationally. All aspects of members’ jobs, whether it be making laws or providing service to people in their home districts, are influenced by this dual concern with representing local constituencies while dealing with national policy.

7 0
3 years ago
In Texas, George H.W. Bush __________________________ and made his fortune.
zloy xaker [14]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to David Orenstein, which two things are the foundation for social life? a. social network and groups c. groups and gr
adell [148]

Answer: c. groups and group activities

Explanation:

According to the Sociologist David Orenstein, GROUPS and GROUP ACTIVITIES are the very foundation upon which social life is structured.

He believed that for humans to be social, they have to participate in groups.

That group can be small with just 2 people or really large like soldiers in a base but bottom line, humans need to be in a group to be social.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the deadline for sending in federal income tax forms?
    15·1 answer
  • Proslavery settlers who came to Kansas from Missouri in the 1800s were known as
    11·2 answers
  • Who receives the benefits and profits from a joint-stock company
    9·1 answer
  • What challenge did American farmers face in the late 1920s? 
    10·2 answers
  • (Economics) People meet for fun and relaxation in a marketplace. <br><br> A. True <br><br> B. False
    10·1 answer
  • A sleeper effect occurs when:____________
    6·1 answer
  • . Radical criminologists argue that ________ is an economic system that requires people to compete against each other in the ind
    10·1 answer
  • Alisa’s neighborhood is usually quiet, but the local newspaper noted an increase in criminal activity there. One morning, Alisa
    8·2 answers
  • In narcolepsy ____________ sleep usually begins almost immediately after the onset of the attack.
    8·1 answer
  • Although Rambo was a popular American film, it has appealed to audiences in remote corners of the world, including small village
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!