Answer: jojo bizzar adventure, and 7 deadly sins
Explanation: :)
Answer:
Tragic hero’s- Faces downfall and Evokes pity
Sage- Teaches the hero and offers guidance
Rebel- rejects social norms and lives by own moral code.
Answer: enhypen
It's like a polaroid love
사랑 촌스런 그 감정
근데 내 가슴이 뛰어
왜 나 이래 나? (야)
왜 사랑에 목 매는 건지?
어차피 뻔한 감정이잖아
분명 다 안다 믿었지
알고도 빠진 함정인가 봐
나도 모르게 when you call my name
가슴 아프게 나의 심장이 쿵쿵
It's like a polaroid love
사랑 촌스런 그 감정
근데 내 가슴이 뛰어
왜 나 이래 나?
It's like a polaroid love
내 뜻대로 되지 않아
흔한 filter조차 없어
But I love the vibe (yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah)
Question #1 Answer: T<span><span>o examine a question that has
more than one side.
</span>You cannot ask your audience to take action
because you haven't taken a firm stance on a subject. You can't take a firm
stance on the subject without having evidence to defend your position. And you
can't defend your position without first stating both sides of an argument. Thus,
the answer is Choice B.</span><span>
</span>Question #2 Answer: <span><span>An argumentative essay does
not use emotions.
An argumentative essay relies on Logos and Pathos; persuasion and logic, not
ethos which is emotions. You would use Ethos and Pathos in a persuasive argument
rather than an argumentative essay.
Question #3 Answer: </span><span>A statement that takes a clear stand on an issue.
A claim states your stance on a subject with conciseness.
Question #4 Answer: </span><span>An argument uses logic to show your stand on an issue is the
best choice.
As I explained before, argumentative essay chiefly relies on Logos (logic). </span>
</span>Question #5 Answer: <span><span>Television watching should be
limited because it has negative influences on teens.
The first choice uses the phrase, "I think." That is a big No-no. Also,
it uses hasty generalization and states that everyone thinks that television is
bad for teens. Choice 2 is incorrect. It does not state the authors stance on
the subject, it only states </span>something someone else should
accomplish. Choice 4 does not state a direct claim. It seems more like
clickbait. It states that there are reasons why teen television viewing should
be limited, however, it does not state the claim incisively. </span>
