prohibition of future slave states north of the Arkansas-Missouri border
which was not a part of the Missouri compromise.
Explanation:
- prohibition of future slave states north of the Arkansas-Missouri border which was not a part of the Missouri compromise.
- The children of slaves already in Missouri were to be freed at age twenty-five was the action which was not a part of the Missouri compromise.
- In an effort to preserve the balance of power in the Congress between the slaves and free states, the Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 and admitting the Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state.
- Other compromises of the Missouri provisions are,
- California enters the Union as a free state.
- The Mexican lands will be divided into the two territories; New Mexico and Utah.
- Popular sovereignty will decide whether they will be the slave or set free.
The Democratic senator by the state of Virginia, Timothy Kaine, crossed out of illegal the decision of Trump to attack Syria.
"Trump's decision to attack Syria without congressional approval is illegal." The Senator argues that President Trump's Administration is based on a war approval of 2001, after the attacks of September 11. It is based on the fact that it is not possible to continue in this way after 17 years, and therefore proposes that the Congress revoke the 2001 authorization and work on a new authorization if necessary.
Since you provide no options,
The event that marked the unification of spain was the marriage of Ferdinand of Aragon and Isabella of Castille in 1496.
their marriage set the stage for the Creation of the Kingdom of Spain
hope this helps
Mountains and it had more farmland than Greece.
<span>Even before the the Russian
Revolution, or W.W. 1, Lenin and the Bolsheviks were distinguished from
all other tendencies in the international socialist and labor movement
by their concern with the problems of oppressed nations and national
minorities, and affirmative support of their struggles for freedom,
independence and the right of self-determination. The Bolsheviks gave
this support to all “people without equal rights” sincerely and
earnestly, but there was nothing “philanthropic” about it. They also
recognized the great revolutionary potential in the situation of
oppressed peoples and nations, and saw them as important allies of the
international working class in the revolutionary struggle against
capitalism.
After November 1917 this new doctrine—with special emphasis on the
Negroes—began to be transmitted to the American communist movement with
the authority of the Russian Revolution behind it. The Russians in the
Comintern started on the American communists with the harsh, insistent
demand that they shake off their own unspoken prejudices, pay attention
to the special problems and grievances of the American Negroes, go to
work among them, and champion their cause in the white community.
It took time for the Americans, raised in a different tradition, to
assimilate the new Leninist doctrine. But the Russians followed up year
after year, piling up the arguments and increasing the pressure on the
American communists until they finally learned and changed, and went to
work in earnest. And the change in the attitude of the American
communists, gradually effected in the ’20s, was to exert a profound
influence in far wider circles in the later years.
By the 1930's, Communist Party influence and action were not restricted
to the issue of “civil rights” in general. They also operated powerfully
to reshape the labor movement and help the Black workers gain a place
in it which had previously been denied. The Black workers themselves,
who had done their share in the great struggles to create the new
unions, were pressing their own claims more aggressively than ever
before. But they needed help, they needed allies. The Communist Party
militants stepped into this role at the critical point in the formative
days of the new unions. The policy and agitation of the Communist Party
at that time did more, 10 times over, than any other to help the Black
workers to rise to a new status of at least semi-citizenship in the new
labour movement created in the ’30s under the banner of the CIO.
Please mark my answer as the brainliest.
</span>
