Answer:
D. FreshDirect shares warehouse space with farmers and livestock producers
Explanation:
FreshDirect does not share its own resources with the supplier in order to get a lower rate. If it does that , he would be practicing a business model which has different entities attached to each other to work for greater goal.
Here, this is not the case. FreshDirect tends to look for out of the box ways to lower supplier cost but "FreshDirect shares warehouse space with farmers and livestock producers" is not one of those ways.
<u>TC</u> Units
$64,500 (High) 2,470
} $30,700 } 2000
$33,800( Low) 470
<u>VC</u><u> </u><u>per</u><u> </u><u>Unit</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u> </u> 30 700 ÷ 2000 = $15.35
when 470 units are sold,( substitute vc per unit = 15.35)
TC = FC + VC
33, 800 = FC + ( 15.35× 470)
FC = $ 26 586
Answer:
Because Language is a communication tool used by everyone in their daily life as a means to convey information and arguments to others. Explanation:
Makes Sense.
Jackson motors tells sue, a consumer, that bliss automobiles are made with metal bodies when they are in fact made of fiberglass. This would be considered a fraudulent misrepresentation.
Under contract law, a plaintiff can recover compensatory damages against any defendant when the court finds that the defendant has committed a fraudulent misrepresentation. Courts will find that a defendant has committed a fraudulent misrepresentation when following factors have been met:
a representation was made by the defendant, the representation which was made was false
that when it is made, the defendant knew that the representation made by him was false.
that the fraudulent misrepresentation was made with the intention so that the plaintiff rely on it.
To know more about fraudulent misrepresentation here:
brainly.com/question/13808699
#SPJ4
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
