Police violence should be the best answer. There are all types of marchers, marching for different things. There would only be a lack of support from other citizens if those marches weren’t agreed with by the majority, basically saying that some marches had support from others. A repeal of voting legislation is definitely not the answer, as a march is not enough to strip someone’s voting rights away, no matter what time period we’re speaking of. A lack of nation television coverage could be a near answer, as some marches may be seen unimportant and therefore not being televised. But as the question directs to marchers experiences, and not a certain march, this wouldn’t be right. By using order of elimination, the only available, and reasonable answer would be police violence, as many marches are seen as public disorder, and therefore treated by the law. Most of the time, these marches are made to disrupt, and polices mostly respond with brutality or brute.
<span>A. British Monarch. One of the most fundamental differences between Canadian and American government is that Canada is a constitutional monarchy while the United States is a type of democracy known as a republic. As a constitutional monarchy, ("Canada's head of state is the British monarch"), who is represented in Canada by an official known as the governor general</span>
Answer: It's the American army during the American Revolution.
Explanation:
Both Germany and the UK have well industrialized economic systems since the UK was the first to develop the Industrial Revolution with its use of factories and socialized labour and the use of coal and the development of steel making, textiles etc and Germany was not far behind.
