1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alona [7]
3 years ago
9

how did epidemics among the native american populations contribute to an increase in the trade of enslaved africans

History
1 answer:
dusya [7]3 years ago
5 0
I am just trying to message someone

You might be interested in
What did anti federalists believe the constitution was lacking
erastova [34]
They said it was lacking a bill of rights
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A. What economic factors motivate people to migrate?
mestny [16]

Answer:

Economic Factors Most of the studies indicate that migration is primarily motivated by economic factors. In developing countries, low agricultural income, agricultural unemployment and underemployment are considered basic factors pushing the migrants towards developed area with greater job opportunities

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What decision did the Supreme Court reach in Dred Scott v. Sandford?
loris [4]

Answer:

There have been many decisions in the history of the US Supreme Court that are hard to call democratic. In the British North American colonies, and then in the USA, the legal foundations of the institution of slavery were created. The English legal system ruled out slavery, but gradually in the local laws of the colonies, and later in the Constitution of the United States and in the case-law of the Supreme Court of the United States, the grounds were formulated on which slaves were considered not to be human subjects, but property. This practice has led to the fact that, shortly before the Civil War, a racist attitude was legalized not only towards slaves, but also to the entire black population of the United States, as is clearly seen in the case of Dread Scott v. Sandford.

Dread Scott was a slave whose owner John Emerson took him from Missouri, the state where slavery was allowed, to Illinois, where slavery was prohibited. A few years later, Scott returned to Missouri with Emerson. Scott believed that since he lived in a free state, he should no longer be considered a slave.

Emerson died in 1843, and three years later, Scott sued Emerson's widow, demanding his freedom. In 1850, he won the case in one of the Missouri courts, but in 1852, the state supreme court overturned the lower court. Meanwhile, Ms. Emerson remarried, and Scott became the legal property of her brother John Sanford. Scott sued Sanford to regain his freedom. The case was investigated in one of the federal courts, which in 1854 ruled against Sanford.

When this case was referred to the Supreme Court, its members decided that Scott did not become free by virtue of his living in a free state and that, being a black man, he is not a citizen and, therefore, has no right to file a lawsuit with a court in force according to the norms of general and statutory law. This decision was widely criticized and contributed to the election of Abraham Lincoln as president.

The judgment in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case was declared unconstitutional by the thirteenth constitutional amendment, which abolished slavery in 1865, and the fourteenth amendment, which granted citizenship to former slaves in 1868.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
United states general who supervised the invasion of normandy
NeX [460]
<h2>Answer: Dwight D. Eisenhower </h2>

Eisenhower was a General of the Army of the United States, who during the Second World War, was the supreme allied commander in the western front of Europe and directed the battle of Normandy.

This military operation was initiated on June 6th, 1944 with the invasion of Normandy by the Allies during the Second World War and culminated in the liberation of the Western Europe territories occupied by the Nazi Germany.

In addition, Eisenhower was the 34th president of the United States between 1953 and 1961.

8 0
3 years ago
What is one thing the U.S. government did to prepare to mobilize troops?
777dan777 [17]

Answer: a.  The War Production Board helped factories quickly shift from only making consumer goods to making war materials.

Explanation:

A key part of the U.S. being able to join the Second World War and contribute so effectively in the time that it did, was the War Production Board's efficiency in shifting American consumer production to war materials for use by the U.S. military and the Allies.

Thanks to the Board, companies shifted their focus from consumer goods even though there was initially some massive pushback. Following a national campaign, opposition subsided and the U.S. was able to pump out so much war material that the war would not have been won without.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose you work for a government agency that regulates the buying and selling in the country. Which main purpose of government
    9·1 answer
  • Does Andrew Carnegie believe that there is anything wrong with amassing wealth?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the name of the b-29 that dropped the bomb on hiroshima
    6·1 answer
  • According to the Declaration of Independence, when should the people have the right to change their government
    7·1 answer
  • What was the French impact on Native American Culture? Why?
    7·1 answer
  • 1. How did the sources of labor change during the Industrialization Era?
    6·1 answer
  • How were minorities at a disadvantage during the Great Depression?
    5·2 answers
  • Who were the jesuits
    14·1 answer
  • The situation in which the amount of available money increases faster than the amount of available goods is known as?
    7·2 answers
  • How does art play a vital role in the culture development of country
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!