1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marianna [84]
3 years ago
8

magine that you could go back in time to advise Parliament on the situation that is about to unfold in India and Pakistan. What

would you tell them? Would you recommend they send their letter to the prime minster? Why or why not?
History
2 answers:
Allisa [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: plato answer

Explanation:I would warn Parliament that the partition would result in long-term hostility and territorial disputes between Pakistan and India. I would tell them about the displacement of millions of people in the frantic mass migration of Muslims into Pakistan and Hindus into India. I would ask the Parliament to take these issues into consideration and proceed with great care.

anyanavicka [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

if actually possible, I would recommending sending the letter to their prime minister,

but there a big possibility that they wont believe me or even pay attention to the problem. That is because mostly in politics, the politicians usually take up the seat to literally "gobble up" money from the citizens for different reasons and project which are never carried out, all they want is to earn money for their own luxuries. They use the trust of the people they have on them.

Why would they want someone to come up to them and tell them that the are about to get themselves plunged into a huge ocean of loans,

they would probably think that if they have minimal time left in their tragedy,

they would ''gobble up'' more money to satisfy their needs even when they are in deep trouble.

(this is my opinion on the problem)

(BTW im from one of the countries so....... u see what u wanna do)

You might be interested in
Which sentence best completes this diagram?
Yuri [45]

Answer:A

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Who specialized in controlling all aspects of production, from the bottom to the top?
Zanzabum

John D. Rockefeller

<span>Rockefeller practiced both horizontal integration and vertical integration. Through horizontal integration, he was able to eliminate competitors and drive them out of business. By the 1890s, Standard Oil controlled 85% of country's refining capacity. Through  vertical integration, he was able to eliminate the middle man and control every aspect of production from start to finish.</span>






7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the 1920s change American life?
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

It changed with the people in it and the president?

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
I need help with all of these!!
fiasKO [112]
Here is some information that will help.

1) Nixon did not want to give over the tapes for multiple reasons. Two of the most popular reasons he used were these tapes discussed issues of national security and he had the "executive privilege" of keeping them.

2) Nixon understands that there are several levels of government all with different functions. However, based on his actions, he believes that all government functions start and end with him.

3) Nixon's idea of executive privilege shows that he felt that the president has a certain set of protections/immunities that other citizens do not have. Nixon felt that his position as president gave him these powers.

4) Chief Justice Burger argues that the idea of executive privilege is determined by the Supreme Court, as they are the ones responsible for interpreting the law.

Without the primary source mentioned in the worksheet, this is the best information I can give you.
5 0
3 years ago
is authored by one or more justices, and agrees with the outcome decided by the majority, but state other reasons supporting the
Fed [463]

the relevant circumstances of a legal dispute or offense as determined by a trial court. ... a court opinion that results when a majority of justices agree on a decision in a ... the tradition that a U.S. senator from the state in which a federal judicial ... votes with the majority but for different legal reasons than the other justices.

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who led resistance movements against European expansion select all that apply
    13·2 answers
  • During the 1920s more than a million blacks moved from the South to cities in the North. Which was not a result of that migratio
    7·1 answer
  • Uprisings such as Shays' Rebellion highlighted the weakness of the?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statements accurately describe results of the invention of the printing press?
    7·1 answer
  • I do not understand what this means. Somebody HELP plz!
    15·1 answer
  • What provided jobs but long hours, low pay, &amp; dangerous working conditions
    15·1 answer
  • witch statement best describes the reason why the american colonies developed a separate culture from great britain during the e
    10·1 answer
  • How do you think the Lowell system affected production?
    8·1 answer
  • How would you describe the Civil Rights era in America and why?
    7·1 answer
  • Question 4 is based on the source below:
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!