1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vadim26 [7]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following sentences contains an error in word choice?

English
2 answers:
rjkz [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Molodets [167]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

C

Explanation:

In the sentence that reads "I had began to study for the test by five o'clock", the person used the wrong participle "began". Because this is the <em>perfect past</em> (indicated by the word "had"), we must use the past participle of the verb.

The verb here is "begin", and its past participle is "begun". So the sentence should say "I had begun to study for the test by five o'clock".

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in
Which events on the American Timeline are an example of the Age of Reform? (Choose more than one answer.)
spin [16.1K]
<span>C.) The first women's rights convention is held in 1848
</span><span>D.) In 1833 the American Anti-Slavery Society is founded</span>
4 0
4 years ago
Whom or Who?<br> Whom or Who was Nakia yelling at just then?
Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

I think whom. Since it sounds better then who in that sentence.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is the first human in the world?​
Ivenika [448]

Answer:

Adam (religiously)

or Lucy (scientifically; there wasn't really a first human, but if you had to come up with someone, this is what might be considered correct, as it is the earliest remains)

Explanation:

religiously [Judaism/Christianity], the first person is believed to be Adam, created by G*d.

scientifically (based on fossil records and theories of evolution), there was no first "human", or, at least, not in the way you're thinking of.

people, like all other organisms, have evolved from a very distant ancestor. This is called a common ancestor, and it is theorized to be shared by all organisms/life on earth [not the same as plants]. However, this ancestor is not even remotely human, it was likely no more than a worm-like creature.

Over time, different versions of this animal started evolving, and eventually, a species (which began to resemble humans as we see them now). Early Australopithecus would probably be the first "humans"--although, they were not really humans. These were in existence 1-5 <em>million</em><em> </em>years ago. (This is when religion does not line up with science--we have fossil remains of Australopithecus, and they are not nearly what Adam is described as from a religious perspective, there is literally no possible way for a human to have been that evolved the same amount of time ago-

**This is why I believe that religious texts are theoretical, and were never written to be facts, they were stories that helped people understand morals. I am somewhat religious)

I digress. So, over time, these old distant versions of humans, that were really, really, different from humans evolved. This is why there is no <em>first </em>human, we evolved together.

One of the earliest recorded "humans" was Lucy, an Australopithecus. We don't believe her to be the first human scientifically, because there could be no first human--our existence <em>is </em>evolution, and there is no start to human history--it begins from a place that was not humans.

So, there was no first human, only the earliest recordings of one (which is what we often simplify to be the first human)

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I was known throughout the world as The Skywayman (Abagnale 6)
zysi [14]
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: c. "I was known throughout the world as 'The Skywayman' (Abagnale 6)." The correct usage of the double quotation and single quotation can be seen here: <span>c. "I was known throughout the world as 'The Skywayman' (Abagnale 6)."</span>
5 0
4 years ago
Which of the following statements best describes the role of a third-person limited narrator?
Vikentia [17]

Answer:

c) The narrator is all-knowing.

Explanation:

It's a narrative technique in which the narrator only understands one character's thoughts and emotions, while other characters are only shown externally. So the Third-Person Limited Narrator knows everything.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July? What is the purpose of this rhetorical question as it used by Douglass?
    14·2 answers
  • Based on your understanding of parallel structure, how does Chang use it?
    14·1 answer
  • “Even the expression is impious; for so unlimited a power can belong only to God….” What is the BEST meaning of impious as Paine
    13·1 answer
  • discribe one imaginative rehersal theat a modern reader might take away from the book Wonder by R.J. palacio 
    6·1 answer
  • Both the video transcript from Dr. X and the Quest for Food Safety and the text Food Safety Myths Exposed present information in
    9·2 answers
  • Working in public administration clerical support,what might one of your jobs be?
    5·1 answer
  • Helpppppppppp plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
    8·1 answer
  • How did Mr.Kowalski steal Mr.Hoodhood's design? Use two Details from the excerpt The Wednesday wars to support your response.
    13·1 answer
  • What inferences can you make about the town of Holcomb based on the languages used in the introduction?
    12·1 answer
  • How do I start writing poetry? Can anyone explain to me how to start writing poetry, I'm too slow to understand. Thanks :)
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!