1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KIM [24]
3 years ago
10

When did Rome think it was important/necessary to have an emperor?

History
1 answer:
Dafna11 [192]3 years ago
3 0

The Romans thought that it was important to have an emperor when there were provincial conflicts and wars along the frontiers.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Before becoming an empire, Rome was a Republic which was founded in 509 BCE. Rome represented a republic democracy  and most of the wealthy families held power and the major offices in Rome. With the expansion of the territory and power of the Roman Republic, internal conflicts emerged when the citizens and the wealthy families struggled for power. Eventually civil wars broke out in the region and the people though that it was essential to have an emperor who would hold most of the power.

You might be interested in
Can someone plz help me
ioda
If you want to live in Mexico you need a passport to get across
3 0
3 years ago
explains how the system of checks and balances is achieved through the judicial application of the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal
12345 [234]
The Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause was enacted to ensure that all people have the same right within the law regardless of where they came from or the color of their skin.
This later on lead to the principle, that Even Government officials will have to be subjected to law just as ordinary citizen do. Which lead to the creation of check and balance system

hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
What were at least 3 of the hardships the Jews faced in the ancient era? Having trouble to remember what they are.
Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

slavery. being put in the ghettos and other such activities

7 0
3 years ago
How was the Boston Massacre the colonist fault?
Nata [24]

The Boston massacre was partially the colonists fault because they were harassing the British soldiers by throwing, sticks, rocks and snowballs at them. The soldiers panicked and many accounts say that they heard someone yell fire.

Hope this helped! If you have any questions please ask!

4 0
3 years ago
Pls help!
Inga [223]
Laws Russia has a lot of Political Power
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the kansas-nebraska act cause more violence?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the Egyptians spend many years and resources building giant tombs for dead pharaohs
    9·1 answer
  • Which event happens last in the appeals process??
    9·1 answer
  • Mark each statement if it describes a Greek religious belief.
    15·2 answers
  • Why did the anti-federalists oppose the idea of having a president?
    7·2 answers
  • Before invading Poland, Hitler reached a secret agreement with the Soviet Union,United States.United Kingdom,European Union.
    15·2 answers
  • Which group was charged the highest rates by the railroads during the late 19th century?
    15·1 answer
  • Hey! I'm an international student that wants to apply to a USA university. For the admission I have to apply to a test called TO
    8·1 answer
  • How was Japanese feudalism similar to European feudalism during the Tokugawa Shogunate
    10·1 answer
  • According to benedict anderson, what concepts had to weaken to allow for nationalism to emerge? this was discussed by dr.mccarty
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!