Answer:
Hunting is the seeking pursuing and capturing or kill wild animals.
Explanation:
Hunting as part of the primary education along side forestry agriculture and fishing,hunting can be means of pest control.
- Hunting also heavily contributed to the endangerment extirpation and extinction of they many animals,hunting is deeply embedded in the human culture.
- Hunting is a long history, is still vital in marginal climates those unsuited for uses agriculture activity regard hunting as cruel unnecessary and unethical.
- Hunting regulations lawful from involves the illegal killing trapping or capture of the hunted species are referred to as birds.
- Hunting state that hunting can be a component of modern management to maintain a population of healthy animals.
- Hunting sees the behavior in the middle as directly related to hunting including of language, culture and religion.
- Hunting may have been one of the multiple environmental factors leading to the extinction of replacement by smaller herbivores.
- Hunting was a crucial component of hunter societies before the dawn of agriculture in the parts of the world.
- Hunting although the varying importance of different species depended on the geographic location.
Answer:
Option 2
Explanation:
Total war is when a nation uses every resource in their power to destroy the opposing force, it also means that a nation will not only attack the opposing nation's military, but also civilians and anything in their path. The idea is often used as a "last resort" to prevent the other country from being able to continue to fight.
Please mark as brainliest :)
What is the question you need help with??
Based on the quote, critics of NAFTA might have claimed that:
A) Mexican workers would be unfairly taken advantage of
<h3>What can be deduced about the critics of NAFTA from the text?</h3>
The critics of NAFTA believe that Mexico was not as strong as the other countries who entered the trade agreement so the possibility that they will be taken advantage of was there.
Having read the above statement from the 1993 agreement of NAFTA, we can see that the reference to the United Mexican states must have proved that the union was needed to stand side by side with the American and Canadian states.
Critics might have believed that Mexico was vulnerable and could be unfairly taken advantage of in the deal.
Learn more about NAFTA here:
brainly.com/question/27372794
#SPJ1
I’m on the same question lol
