Anasazi was largely nomadic
With the regards to the statement that if not for Americans participating in WWI, Prohibition would not happen, this statement is <u>false</u>.
<h3>Why is this statement false?</h3>
The movement to enact prohibition was already growing strongly before the First World War broke out.
In fact, before the U.S. joined the war, those in support of Prohibition had majorities in the two houses of Congress. WWI was merely an event that sped up the rate of prohibition and without it, Prohibition would have still happened at a later stage.
Find out more on Prohibition at brainly.com/question/3814594.
Answer:
B. The bill must be passed by both the chambers, and the US president must approve it.
Explanation:
Answer:
Bill Clinton
Explanation:
I made this judgement based on their economic performance alone. None of them were particularly a stand out in terms of socio-cultural perspective.
Between the three of them Bill Clinton had significantly more economic accomplishments:
- He was the first president who achieve budget surplus in the last century. (With a $236 billion surplus in 2000). Reagan increased the national debt by $1.85 trillion and Bush increased the national debt by $ 6.1 trillion.
-Bill Clinton reached the lowest unemployment in history (4.0 percent in November 2000)
- USA also experienced its longest economic expansion in history, with around 115 months of continuous economic expansion with an average of 4% increase each.
