Why are secondary sources important to the study of history?

2 answers:

6 0

Well, if a primary source says that a country one a historic battle, and we find rope and unfired weapons and a large amount of bones inside of the rope area, then the primary source is then questioned.

Sphinxa [80]3 years ago

5 0

Scholars writing about historical events, people, objects, or ideas produce secondary sources because they help explain new or different positions and ideas about primary sources.

You might be interested in

In 1949, the chinese communist party (under the leadership of __________) defeated the nationalist party (kuomintang, led by ___

Makovka662 [10]

In 1949, the Chinese Communist Party (under the leadership of Mao Zedong) defeated the Nationalist party (Kuomingtang, led by Chiang Kai-Shek) in a civil war, causing the United States Republicans to accuse the Truman administration of "losing" China to the Communists.

The answers are Mao Zedong and Chiang Kai-Shek.

5 0

3 years ago

In Ming and Qing society, upper class women were

Temka [501]

In Ming and Qing society, upper class women were confined to domestic roles, cripple their own feet through foot-binding and seen as inferior.

Chinese women have always faced difficulties in society as they are confined to do domestic chores.
Women virtue admired in Chinese society.
In Upper society, girls from age five had their feet tied with cloth, believing that small feet would attract to their future groom.
The "three obedience and four virtues" ideas were popular in Chinese society for an ideal woman.

Therefore, we can conclude that in upper-class society women faced hardship where their rights were restricted by society.

Thus option All of the above is the correct answer.

Learn more about "Ming Emperors" here:

brainly.com/question/1286072