Most of the people in the Southeast culture did tended to be farmers, and the reasons for this are very simple:
- Climate; the climate was excellent for farming, warm and moist for most of the year, with more than enough precipitation and sunlight.
- Soil; the soil was very fertile, which was enabled by the deposits made every year by the rivers, and also because the climate was perfect for quick dissolving of the biomass which is essential for creating a fertile layer of soil.
- Water; apart from the high amount of precipitation, there's also lots of rivers in this part that were enabling that the plants can be watered all year long.
- Agricultural cultures available; the agricultural cultures that were native for this part were highly demanded and very profitable, which of course was a big stimulation for large scale farming.
<span>The MTV generation signifies the group who witnessed the end of the analog age and the beginning of the _____ age.
b. </span>millennial
Farmers in southern Italy were badly affected during this time of unification.
Italian Unification is a term that refers to the historical process that occurred during the 19th century in which the various states of the Italian peninsula were united as a nation.
One of the highlights of this historical process was the union of the southern states with those of the north. This relationship particularly affected southern farmers as the aristocracy and the bourgeoisie became allied to the detriment of small producers.
This process, which seriously affected the farmers of the south, began with the implementation of unequal policies that favored the mercantile societies of the north in privileges.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/12114445
Answer:
Explanation:
Rwandans take history seriously. Hutu who killed Tutsi did so for many reasons, but beneath the individual motivations lay a common fear rooted in firmly held but mistaken ideas of the Rwandan past. Organizers of the genocide, who had themselves grown up with these distortions of history, skillfully exploited misconceptions about who the Tutsi were, where they had come from, and what they had done in the past. From these elements, they fueled the fear and hatred that made genocide imaginable. Abroad, the policy-makers who decided what to do—or not do—about the genocide and the journalists who reported on it often worked from ideas that were wrong and out-dated. To understand how some Rwandans could carry out a genocide and how the rest of the world could turn away from it, we must begin with history
