1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MatroZZZ [7]
3 years ago
11

An increase in government spending with no change in taxes leads to a

Law
1 answer:
Tema [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

higher interest rate

Explanation:

Government spending refers to money spent by the government on the purchase of goods and provision of services including education, healthcare, public consumption, and public investment, etc.

Government spending can be financed by government borrowing or taxes. So, an increase in government spending with no change in taxes leads to a higher interest rate.

The total interest on an amount depends on the principal sum, the interest rate, and the time for which the amount has been lent, deposited, or borrowed.

You might be interested in
a. Walt decides to shoot his Yolanda, whom he blames for all his troubles. As he is driving to her home to carry out the murder,
Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

There is no crime of homicide. Walt had no motive for killing the jogger and this was clearly an accident. Not even reckless driving. Walt stops to help. That's all we know. Did he then leave the scene? That would be a crime. Based on what we're told, there is no homicide. No intent to kill the jogger.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you tell your therapist you vape or smoke, do they have to report it or tell your parents?
Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

If you are under age they will report it to your parents then report it >_<

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is factual causation and legal causation mean the same thing? true or false
nikklg [1K]
The correct answer would be “False”
5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ASAP
Nataliya [291]

Answer:Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that settled a recount dispute in Florida's 2000 presidential election. The ruling was issued on December 13, 2000. On December 9, the Court had preliminary halted the Florida recount that was occurring.

Full case name: George W. Bush and Richard ...

Prior: Judgment for defendant, Fla. Cir. Ct. matt...

Citations: 531 U.S. 98 (more)121 S. Ct. 525; 148 ...

Explanation:its all on the web ;)

5 0
3 years ago
Before releasing information to the public domain in what order must it be reviewed?
valkas [14]

Answer:

Local command, security manager, and then Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The typical first main phase in response to a research misconduct allegation is called:
    11·1 answer
  • What is the original position?
    6·1 answer
  • The method of delivering a chemical or any other agent is called
    10·1 answer
  • Intellectual property can be legally protected even though it is not a physical object.
    9·1 answer
  • The number of presidential electors is determined by a state’s representation in _______________ . Indiana has ________ electors
    15·1 answer
  • What happens after the actions mentioned in the quote
    14·2 answers
  • Which law protected the voting rights of minorities?
    13·1 answer
  • I need this answered right now
    5·2 answers
  • Country B has a GDP of $1 trillion and a GDP per capita of $27,000. Its economy is a mix of manufacturing, high tech, services,
    9·1 answer
  • List three reasons to keep sovereign immunity
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!